Practice Usage Scenarios - 3 | Module 3: Introduction to 5G: Vision, Scenarios, and Spectrum | Advanced Mobile Communications Micro Specialization
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

3 - Usage Scenarios

Learning

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does eMBB stand for?

πŸ’‘ Hint: It involves high data rates.

Question 2

Easy

What is the primary focus of URLLC?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think of critical applications requiring quick responses.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does eMBB primarily focus on?

  • Low latency
  • High data rates
  • Device reliability

πŸ’‘ Hint: Focus on what users need most during heavy usage.

Question 2

True or False: URLLC stands for Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications.

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about communications that cannot fail.

Solve 2 more questions and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Design a smart city infrastructure using both mMTC and URLLC. Explain how they would complement each other.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider what aspects of the city require rapid interaction and what demands large-scale data connectivity.

Question 2

Propose a scenario where D2D communications could drastically improve response times during a natural disaster.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the immediacy of communications when traditional networks fail.

Challenge and get performance evaluation