Practice Part B - 64.1.6 | 64. Multi-Transistor Amplifiers: Cascode Amplifier (Contd.) – Numerical Examples (Part B) | Analog Electronic Circuits - Vol 3
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is a cascode amplifier?

💡 Hint: Think of how multiple transistors are used together.

Question 2

Easy

Define the Miller effect.

💡 Hint: Consider how capacitance interacts with voltage in amplifiers.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the key advantage of a cascode amplifier?

  • Lower Gain
  • Increased Bandwidth
  • Higher Input Capacitance

💡 Hint: Think about the configuration and its influence on signal integrity.

Question 2

True or False: The Miller effect results in reduced capacitance in a circuit.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider how output variations create correlated effects on input capacitance.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Design a cascode amplifier to be used in an audio application. Discuss the components used and justify each choice.

💡 Hint: Consider trade-offs between gain and bandwidth.

Question 2

Given an output resistance of 2.6 kOhm and an input capacitance of 10 pF how would you calculate the amplifier's cutoff frequency?

💡 Hint: Remember the relationship between frequency, resistance, and capacitance.

Challenge and get performance evaluation