Practice Robustness - 3.3 | The Future of AI – Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities | Artificial Intelligence Advance
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is robustness in AI?

💡 Hint: Think about the AI's strength against challenges.

Question 2

Easy

Define an adversarial attack.

💡 Hint: Consider what someone might do to trick the AI.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does robustness in AI refer to?

  • Ability to deceive
  • Ability to recover from failure
  • Ability to resist adversarial attacks

💡 Hint: Think about what makes an AI strong against challenges.

Question 2

True or False: Adversarial attacks are designed to improve model performance.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider the motives behind such attacks.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Consider an AI model developed for medical image analysis. What strategies can be employed to enhance its robustness against adversarial attacks that distort X-ray images?

💡 Hint: Remember, practice under varying conditions enhances performance.

Question 2

Discuss how the accuracy-robustness trade-off might affect the deployment of AI in self-driving cars. What measures can be taken to address these challenges?

💡 Hint: Think about how redundancy can improve reliability in critical applications.

Challenge and get performance evaluation