Practice CPU Communication - 24.2.2 | 24. External Devices and Their Types | Computer Organisation and Architecture - Vol 3
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What are two examples of human-readable devices?

💡 Hint: Think of devices that show information in a way that humans can understand.

Question 2

Easy

Define I/O module.

💡 Hint: Focus on the role of the I/O module in the computer system.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does DMA stand for?

  • Direct Machine Access
  • Direct Memory Access
  • Direct Managed Access

💡 Hint: Think about the role of memory in data transfer processes.

Question 2

True or False: In programmed I/O, the CPU can perform other tasks while waiting for I/O device readiness.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider what happens during the waiting period of the CPU.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

You are tasked with designing a new I/O module for a computer system that optimizes data transfer. Discuss the key considerations and features you would implement.

💡 Hint: Consider both speed and flexibility in I/O handling.

Question 2

Propose a scenario where programmed I/O might still be preferred over DMA despite its limitations.

💡 Hint: Think of the system's requirements and how they affect decision-making in method selection.

Challenge and get performance evaluation