4.1.6.1. Fallacy of Affirming the Conclusion

Try these first

1. 1.

   What is the structure of the fallacy of affirming the conclusion?

   Hint

   Think about the logical relationships between premises.

2. 2.

   Give an example of a valid argument form.

   Hint

   Recall the patterns of valid reasoning.

3. 3.

   What is an example of affirming the conclusion?

   • If it is raining
   • then the ground is wet. The ground is wet
   • therefore it is raining.
   • If you have a driver's license
   • you can drive. You have a driver's license
   • therefore you can drive.
   • If you wake up early
   • you will have time for breakfast. You woke up early
   • therefore you had time for breakfast.

   Hint

   Think of relationships between cause and effect.

4. 4.

   True or False: The converse of a valid argument is also valid.

   • True
   • False

   Hint

   Reflect on how argument structures work.

5. 5.

   Construct a dialogue illustrating a scenario where a character commits the fallacy of affirming the conclusion.

   Hint

   Focus on the reasoning flaws of the conclusions drawn.

6. 6.

   Analyze a media argument that illustrates the fallacy of affirming the conclusion.

   Hint

   Explore ways to critically evaluate media claims.