Practice Synthesizable vs. Non-Synthesizable Constructs - 4.7.2 | Week 4 - Verilog Hardware | Embedded System
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

4.7.2 - Synthesizable vs. Non-Synthesizable Constructs

Learning

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is a synthesizable construct?

💡 Hint: Think about how the construct would relate to physical gates.

Question 2

Easy

Give an example of a non-synthesizable construct.

💡 Hint: Consider constructs meant for setting initial conditions.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

Which of the following is a synthesizable construct?

  • initial blocks
  • assign statements
  • real and realtime constructs

💡 Hint: Remember the purpose of constructs in relation to hardware.

Question 2

True or False: Non-synthesizable constructs can be used in testbenches.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Think about testbench functionality.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Provide a complete example of a Verilog module that uses both synthesizable and non-synthesizable constructs. Highlight each type clearly.

💡 Hint: Be mindful of the definitions we discussed.

Question 2

Discuss the implications of having an implied latch in your design and how it relates to the boundaries between synthesizable and non-synthesizable constructs.

💡 Hint: Reflect on how every conditional path should be specified.

Challenge and get performance evaluation