Practice Social Justice and Access - 5 | Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) | Genetic Engineering Basic
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does equitable access mean in the context of genetic technologies?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider who gets to use the technology.

Question 2

Easy

Why is public trust important in science?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how people feel about new innovations.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the primary concern regarding access to genetic technologies?

  • Only wealthy individuals benefit
  • Genetic technologies are always safe
  • Everyone has equal access now

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about economic disparities.

Question 2

True or False: Public trust is unnecessary when discussing genetic innovations.

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider the relationship between the public and science.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Discuss the ethical implications of allowing only wealthy nations to dictate access to genetic technologies.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider the social and ethical dimensions of access.

Question 2

Propose a comprehensive initiative that aims at bridging the gap between rich and poor nations in genetic therapies access.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about health, education, and international collaboration.

Challenge and get performance evaluation