Practice Guidelines and Standards - 40.8 | 40. Quality of Irrigation Water | Hydrology & Water Resources Engineering - Vol 3
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does BIS stand for?

💡 Hint: Think of an Indian organization that sets standards.

Question 2

Easy

Name one parameter included in the BIS guidelines.

💡 Hint: This measure indicates the salinity of water.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What organization sets the Bureau of Indian Standards?

  • Department of Agriculture
  • Ministry of Consumer Affairs
  • Food and Agriculture Organization

💡 Hint: Think about government departments.

Question 2

True or False: The FAO guidelines include recommendations for crops not suitable for low-quality water.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider how crops vary in their tolerance to water quality.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

If an agricultural region observes an increase in sodium levels in their irrigation water, what management practices could farmers implement to mitigate the negative effects?

💡 Hint: Think of ways to manage water quality through practical actions.

Question 2

How would you apply the FAO's irrigation water quality classifications in planning a new agricultural project?

💡 Hint: Consider how classifications affect decision-making in agriculture.

Challenge and get performance evaluation