Practice Ethical Review Boards (ERBs) - 11.4.5 | Unit 11: Research Methodologies in Social Sciences | IB Board Grade 12 – Individuals and Societies
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is the main role of an Ethical Review Board?

💡 Hint: Consider what 'ethical' practices involve.

Question 2

Easy

Define informed consent in research.

💡 Hint: Think about the information given to participants.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the main function of Ethical Review Boards?

  • To fund research
  • To oversee ethical standards
  • To recruit participants

💡 Hint: Think about the protections they provide.

Question 2

True or False: Informed consent requires that participants be aware of any risks involved in research.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider what information participants need.

Solve 2 more questions and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Analyze a scenario where a research project lacks ERB approval. What ethical violations are present, and how can they affect the outcome of the study?

💡 Hint: Consider the processes ERBs enforce.

Question 2

Discuss the steps a researcher should take to ensure their study meets ERB approval criteria. Outline challenges they might face.

💡 Hint: Think about what elements are required for approval.

Challenge and get performance evaluation