Practice Cardboard - 3.1.3 | Unit 2: Art and Environment: Shaping Our Surroundings | IB Grade 8 Visual Arts
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

3.1.3 - Cardboard

Enroll to start learning

You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.

Learning

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is scoring in cardboard art?

💡 Hint: Think about how to bend cardboard neatly.

Question 2

Easy

Name one advantage of using cardboard for artists.

💡 Hint: Consider the impact on the environment.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is one of the main benefits of using cardboard in art?

  • It is expensive
  • It is recyclable
  • It is heavy

💡 Hint: Consider how materials impact sustainability.

Question 2

True or False: Scoring allows for bending cardboard without cutting.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Think about how we create bends in paper or cardboard.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Design a cardboard artwork with an environmental theme and detail the techniques you would use to create it.

💡 Hint: Consider how you can use form to reflect your message.

Question 2

Evaluate the impact of using recycled cardboard versus new cardboard for environmental art projects.

💡 Hint: Think about the lifecycle of materials in your evaluation.

Challenge and get performance evaluation