Practice Criterion C: Communicating - 3.3 | Chapter: Assessment in MYP Geography | IB MYP Grade 10 – Individuals & Societies (Geography)
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

Define Criterion C in your own words.

💡 Hint: Think about how ideas are presented.

Question 2

Easy

What is a cartographic task?

💡 Hint: Consider how you represent geographical data.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the focus of Criterion C?

  • Writing essays
  • Communicating geographical information
  • Conducting fieldwork

💡 Hint: Think about assessment criteria in your geography class.

Question 2

True or False: Structured formats include only written reports.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider what other formats can present geographical information.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Create a presentation that combines a cartographic task and a written report on a geographical issue. Explain your choices for using languages and formats.

💡 Hint: Think about how visuals can complement your text.

Question 2

Analyze a historical geographical dispute that was poorly communicated. What communication strategies would you implement to avoid misunderstandings?

💡 Hint: Consider real-world examples where poor communication led to problems.

Challenge and get performance evaluation