Practice Independence of the Judiciary - 3 | Chapter 6: The Judiciary | ICSE Class 12 Political Science
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is judicial independence?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the relationship between the judiciary and the legislative/executive branches.

Question 2

Easy

Name one feature ensuring judicial independence.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider what protects judges from losing their jobs unexpectedly.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What ensures the independence of the judiciary?

  • Legislative Control
  • Financial Independence
  • Executive Supervision

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how judges are paid.

Question 2

True or False: Judges can be removed by a simple majority in Parliament.

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Recall the process of impeachment.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Evaluate the role of judicial independence in maintaining democratic stability. Provide examples to support your analysis.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think of instances where courts defended rights or nullified laws.

Question 2

Propose reforms to enhance the effectiveness of judicial accountability while maintaining independence. Justify your recommendations.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider existing accountability structures and suggest improvements.

Challenge and get performance evaluation