Practice Armstrong's Axioms - 6.3 | Module 6: Normalization | Introduction to Database Systems
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is the Reflexivity rule in functional dependencies?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about subsets and how knowing more inherently includes knowing less.

Question 2

Easy

Give an example of the Augmentation Rule.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider if adding attributes changes what is already known.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does the Reflexivity Rule state?

  • If A determines B
  • If A is a subset of B
  • If B is a subset of A

πŸ’‘ Hint: Remember subsets and how they relate.

Question 2

Which rule states that if A→B, then AC→BC also holds?

  • Transitivity
  • Decomposition
  • Augmentation

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about enhancement without change.

Solve 2 more questions and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

You have the functional dependencies: CourseID β†’ Instructor, Instructor β†’ Department. Can you demonstrate the use of Transitivity to draw a new conclusion?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Look for linking attributes between the dependencies!

Question 2

If A→BC holds, how do you show the practical uses of the Decomposition Rule? Create a scenario to illustrate.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how distinct relationships affect database clarity.

Challenge and get performance evaluation