Practice Role of Cryptography in Data Integrity and Non-Repudiation - 3 | Module 2: Basic Cryptography | Introductory Cyber Security
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is a cryptographic hash function?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how it represents data like a fingerprint.

Question 2

Easy

What is the primary role of digital signatures?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Relate it to the verification of messages.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What process ensures that a document remains unchanged during transmission?

  • Encryption
  • Hashing
  • Compression

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about verifying a package's contents.

Question 2

True or False: A digital signature can be forged easily if the hashing function is weak.

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider the implications of weak security.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Explain how preimage and collision resistance are crucial in protecting against attacks on cryptographic hash functions.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider the consequences if these properties were compromised.

Question 2

Given two messages, M1 and M2, if an attacker finds a collision such that H(M1) = H(M2), discuss how this affects the credibility of digital signatures.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the implications for online security.

Challenge and get performance evaluation