Practice Protocol Selection for Different Scenarios - 4.4 | Chapter 4: Advanced Communication Protocols and Standards | IoT (Internet of Things) Advance
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

Which protocol is suitable for low-power, short-range sensors?

💡 Hint: Think about protocols optimized for energy efficiency.

Question 2

Easy

What is AMQP used for?

💡 Hint: Consider scenarios needing reliability and integration.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

Which protocol is best suited for low-power devices?

  • AMQP
  • MQTT-SN
  • NB-IoT

💡 Hint: Think about the protocols' optimization for short-range communication.

Question 2

AMQP is suited for simplistic messaging tasks.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Recall what AMQP is designed for and its complexity.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Given a smart agriculture scenario requiring both mobility and real-time data collection, which protocols would be most appropriate and why?

💡 Hint: Think about the mobility needs compared to data requirements.

Question 2

Discuss how protocol diversity creates challenges during device integration in a smart city project, and suggest potential frameworks or standards to address these challenges.

💡 Hint: Consider various elements of device communication and their interoperability.

Challenge and get performance evaluation