Practice Core Concept - 2.2.1 | Module 7: Advanced ML Topics & Ethical Considerations (Weeks 14) | Machine Learning
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

2.2.1 - Core Concept

Learning

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does bias in machine learning refer to?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think of examples where AI might treat groups differently.

Question 2

Easy

Name one source of bias in AI.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider the origins of the training data.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the main goal of fairness in machine learning?

  • To maximize accuracy
  • To ensure equitable treatment among groups
  • To minimize data usage

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the societal implications of AI decisions.

Question 2

True or False: Explainable AI techniques are only necessary for highly complex models.

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider the importance of clarity in all AI applications.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Design a framework for ensuring fairness in an AI system used for hiring. What steps would you include?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about each phase from data collection to system deployment.

Question 2

Analyze the potential weaknesses of relying solely on one metric like accuracy to evaluate an AI model.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider what other metrics might provide a better understanding.

Challenge and get performance evaluation