Practice Disk Scheduling - 9.3.3 | Module 9: I/O Systems | Operating Systems
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does the FCFS algorithm stand for?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how requests are managed based on their order.

Question 2

Easy

Which scheduling algorithm selects the nearest request to the current head?

πŸ’‘ Hint: It optimizes performance by reducing distance.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does SSTF stand for?

  • Standard Shortest Time First
  • Shortest-Seek-Time First
  • Standard Seek Time First

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider the purpose of minimizing seek distances.

Question 2

Is it true that the LOOK algorithm can avoid unnecessary movements?

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how it compares to SCAN in handling requests.

Solve 2 more questions and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Given the requests 75, 30, 200, 180 starting at 100, calculate total head movement for SCAN and C-SCAN and explain which is more efficient.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Calculate each move step-by-step and compare.

Question 2

If you were to implement an IO queue with random arrival times for requests, discuss which disk scheduling algorithm would most likely suffer from starvation, and give an example.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider how arriving requests can overlap.

Challenge and get performance evaluation