Practice Tips for Better Creative Prompts - 6.9 | Prompt Engineering for Creative Tasks | Prompt Engineering fundamental course
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is sensory language? Provide an example.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how it engages the senses.

Question 2

Easy

Name a genre and give a brief description.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider genres like fantasy or science fiction too.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the purpose of using rich sensory language in prompts?

  • To make prompts sound fancy
  • To enhance imagery
  • To confuse the AI

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how details affect visualization.

Question 2

True or False: Providing no context in a prompt can lead to unstructured AI responses.

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider how guidance influences direction.

Solve 3 more questions and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Create an intricate prompt for a dialogue scene set during a futuristic war. Include specific sensory details, a defined tone, and role assignment.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think of the sounds, feelings, and visual chaos of the battlefield.

Question 2

Reflect on the importance of context by discussing how two identical prompts might yield different outputs based solely on the genre assigned. Give examples.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider how expectations shift with genres.

Challenge and get performance evaluation