Practice Sampling of Continuous-Time Signals - 4.6.1 | Module 4 - Fourier Transform Analysis of Continuous-Time Aperiodic Signals | Signals and Systems
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

4.6.1 - Sampling of Continuous-Time Signals

Learning

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does the sampling period (Ts) represent?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the time taken for one sample.

Question 2

Easy

How is the sampling frequency (fs) calculated?

πŸ’‘ Hint: How many samples are taken per second?

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does the sampling period (Ts) define?

  • Time interval between samples
  • Frequency of sampling
  • Amplitude of the signal

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think of it as the duration for one sample.

Question 2

True or False: The sampling frequency (fs) is the inverse of the sampling period (Ts).

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: How are these two terms related?

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

A continuous-time signal x(t) has frequency components up to 800 Hz. What is the minimum sampling frequency required to avoid aliasing?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Recall the Nyquist Sampling Theorem.

Question 2

If a signal is sampled at 1000 Hz, calculate the maximum frequency that can be accurately represented.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the definition of Nyquist frequency.

Challenge and get performance evaluation