Practice The Three Scrum Artifacts: Transparency of Work and Value - 5.3 | Evolutionary & Agile Software Development and Requirements Foundation | Software Engineering Micro Specialization
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

5.3 - The Three Scrum Artifacts: Transparency of Work and Value

Learning

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is the purpose of the Product Backlog?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think of it as the overall requirements list.

Question 2

Easy

Who manages the Sprint Backlog?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider who is responsible for the day-to-day tasks.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the Product Backlog?

  • A list of completed tasks
  • An ordered list of work items
  • A Scrum team role

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about what the Product Owner manages.

Question 2

The Sprint Backlog is managed by:

  • Scrum Master
  • Development Team
  • Product Owner

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider who is responsible for executing tasks.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

How can changes in customer requirements affect the Product Backlog during a project?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the dynamic nature of requirements in Agile.

Question 2

Illustrate how the definition of 'Done' for an Increment can vary between projects.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider the specific quality expectations for Increments.

Challenge and get performance evaluation