Practice Relationships Between Use Cases - 4.2 | Object-Oriented Analysis and Design - Core UML Diagrams | Software Engineering Micro Specialization
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

4.2 - Relationships Between Use Cases

Learning

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does the <> relationship signify?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about mandatory functionalities.

Question 2

Easy

Give an example of an <> relationship.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider optional behaviors in a payment process.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does the <> relationship represent?

  • Optional behavior
  • Mandatory behavior
  • No relationship

πŸ’‘ Hint: Remember the key difference between obligations.

Question 2

True or False: The <> relationship is used for behaviors that must always occur.

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the definition of mandatory vs. optional.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Create a detailed UML diagram for a library system demonstrating at least three use cases with varying relationships, utilizing both <> and <>.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about mandatory processes and conditional enhancements.

Question 2

Discuss a scenario where incorrect usage of <> could lead to confusion among user requirements.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider what actions are critical to process.

Challenge and get performance evaluation