Practice Complement - 5.3.2.2 | Module 5: Context-Free Grammars (CFG) and Languages | Theory of Computation
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

5.3.2.2 - Complement

Learning

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does it mean for a class of languages to be closed under an operation?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how operations combine or transform languages.

Question 2

Easy

Is the union of two CFLs always a CFL?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Recall the rules for combining languages.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

Are Context-Free Languages closed under union?

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Remember what closure properties signify.

Question 2

Which operation results in a language that is not necessarily a CFL if both operands are CFLs?

  • Union
  • Concatenation
  • Intersection
  • Kleene Star

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the complexity of counting in languages.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Design two context-free languages that demonstrate closure properties and prove why their intersection results in a language that is not a CFL.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Explore how multiple counting creates complications.

Question 2

Explain the implications if CFLs were closed under complement and how it conflicts with established theories.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Relate closure concepts to logical structures.

Challenge and get performance evaluation