Practice Automatic Process - 2.4.2 | Lab Module 10: ASIC Design Flow - Floorplanning, Placement, and Routing (Conceptual/Tool Demonstration) | VLSI Design Lab
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

2.4.2 - Automatic Process

Learning

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is the main goal of automatic placement in ASIC design?

💡 Hint: Consider the effects of wire length on circuit performance.

Question 2

Easy

Define routing in the context of ASIC design.

💡 Hint: Think about how cells are physically connected to create functionality.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the primary objective of automatic placement in the ASIC design process?

  • Minimize power consumption
  • Minimize wirelength
  • Maximize cell size

💡 Hint: Think about the logical connection of cells during placement.

Question 2

True/False: Automatic routing makes manual adjustments to ensure DRC compliance.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider how automation operates in design tasks.

Solve 3 more questions and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Given a specific netlist and a set of design constraints, propose an initial automatic placement strategy, detailing how you would minimize wirelength and meet timing constraints. What factors would contribute to your decision-making?

💡 Hint: Consider how the arrangement impacts future routing challenges.

Question 2

Design a plan to address a scenario where post-layout extraction reveals significant parasitic effects. How would you iterate through earlier stages to achieve timing closure?

💡 Hint: Reflect on the iterative nature of design and verification.

Challenge and get performance evaluation