Practice Clock-to-Output Delay (t_CQ) Results - 5.3 | Lab Module 8: Introduction to Sequential Logic: CMOS D-Latch/Flip-Flop Schematic and Simulation | VLSI Design Lab
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

5.3 - Clock-to-Output Delay (t_CQ) Results

Learning

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

Define clock-to-output delay (t_CQ).

💡 Hint: Think about the activity of the clock and its impact on the output state.

Question 2

Easy

What does setup time (t_setup) represent?

💡 Hint: Consider the timing needs before capturing input data.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does t_CQ stand for?

  • Clock-to-Output Delay
  • Clock-to-Input Delay
  • Data-to-Output Delay

💡 Hint: Focus on how timing measurements are named.

Question 2

True or False: A smaller t_CQ indicates a slower circuit.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider the impact of delay on performance.

Solve 2 more questions and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Design a flip-flop circuit that illustrates the effects of metastability. Describe how you'd approach testing it.

💡 Hint: Use simulation software to capture instances of metastability.

Question 2

Given a flip-flop with specific timing values: t_CQ = 120 ps, t_setup = 80 ps, and t_hold = 30 ps, calculate the maximum frequency of operation.

💡 Hint: Use the individual timings to explore implications.

Challenge and get performance evaluation