Practice Constructor Injection - 19.3.1 | 19. Dependency Injection and Inversion of Control | Advance Programming In Java
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is Constructor Injection?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how objects get their required components.

Question 2

Easy

Give an example of Constructor Injection in Java.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider class instantiation.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the main advantage of Constructor Injection?

  • Increased coupling
  • Loose coupling
  • Tighter control

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how dependencies are managed in an application.

Question 2

True or False: Constructor Injection makes testing more difficult.

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider how changes in dependencies affect testing.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Consider a classroom application where a Teacher needs a Classroom. Design these classes using Constructor Injection and explain how this aids in flexibility.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Focus on how changing dependencies impact class behavior.

Question 2

Evaluate a scenario in which Constructor Injection might lead to too many parameters in a constructor. Suggest a solution to manage complex dependencies.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how classes could be refactored for better management.

Challenge and get performance evaluation