Practice Conclusion - 12.6 | 12. Revisiting MOSFET (Contd.) - Part A | Analog Electronic Circuits - Vol 1
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What do p-MOSFETs use as charge carriers?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the type of semiconductor material.

Question 2

Easy

Describe how p-MOSFETs are biased for operation.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Focus on the potential differences.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What type of charge carriers do p-MOSFETs use?

  • Electrons
  • Holes
  • Neutrons

πŸ’‘ Hint: Recall the semiconductor material type.

Question 2

True or False: In a p-MOSFET, the gate must be at a higher potential than the source for it to operate.

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how biasing affects transistor behavior.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

A p-MOSFET has a threshold voltage of -1V. If a gate voltage of -3V and a drain-source voltage of -4V is applied, determine if the device is operating in saturation and calculate the drain current.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Pay attention to voltage polarities and compare them for current calculations.

Question 2

Discuss the effects on a p-MOSFET's I-V characteristics when body and source are tightly coupled versus loosely connected.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider impacts on junctions in semiconductor devices.

Challenge and get performance evaluation