Practice Modeling - 1.3 | Natural Language Processing (NLP) in Depth | Artificial Intelligence Advance
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does Naive Bayes assume about word independence?

💡 Hint: Think about the 'naive' part of Naive Bayes.

Question 2

Easy

True or False: Support Vector Machines can be used for regression.

💡 Hint: Consider the different types of SVM tasks.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the main assumption of Naive Bayes?

  • Words are dependent on each other
  • Words are independent of each other
  • Naive Bayes cannot classify text

💡 Hint: Recall the definition of 'naive' in Naive Bayes.

Question 2

True or False: LSTM can process long sequences effectively.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider how LSTM manages information over time.

Solve 2 more questions and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Consider a scenario where an email needs to be categorized into spam or not spam. Describe how you would use Naive Bayes for classification, including the relevant features.

💡 Hint: Focus on how word frequency influences classification.

Question 2

In implementing a chatbot, explain how you might use both SVM and BERT to enhance user experience. Include strengths and weaknesses of each model.

💡 Hint: Think about separating tasks based on strengths.

Challenge and get performance evaluation