Practice Differing Interpretations - 9.4.2 | 9. CONSTITUTION AS A LIVING DOCUMENT | CBSE 11 Indian Constitution at Work
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does 'differing interpretations' refer to?

💡 Hint: Consider who interprets laws.

Question 2

Easy

In which years did frequent amendments occur?

💡 Hint: Think about the political turmoil in India.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is a significant effect of differing interpretations of the Constitution?

  • Improved understanding
  • Amendments by Parliament
  • Diminished role of judiciary

💡 Hint: Think about the power dynamics between government branches.

Question 2

True or False: The judiciary always has the final say in constitutional matters.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider the power of Parliament.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Assess the impact of the urgent political climate between 1970 and 1975 on judicial decision-making and subsequent amendments in the Constitution.

💡 Hint: Think about the emergency and its effect on power dynamics.

Question 2

Critically analyze the balance of power between judicial interpretations and parliamentary authority as reflected in amendments during this time.

💡 Hint: Reflect on how amendments created a legal framework for resolving disputes.

Challenge and get performance evaluation