Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Let's begin by discussing the background of the Khurda Uprising. The region involved, Khurda, was a populous territory with a century-old heritage. What do you think contributed to the rise of tensions in Khurda during this time?
Was it because of the British taking over the territory?
Exactly, Student_1! The British annexed Orissa in 1803, and disrupted local governance. What else do you think made the local rulers and people resentful towards the British?
Maybe the increased taxes and the way they collected them?
That's right! The British increased revenue demands significantly without considering the productive capacities of the land. This caused widespread discontent.
And how did this affect the local leaders like Mukunda Dev II?
Good question, Student_3! Mukunda Dev II felt robbed of his power and territory. His attempts to negotiate with the British were futile, leading to him joining forces with other discontented chiefs.
To summarize, the annexation of territories, oppressive taxation, and a lack of respect for local leaders played critical roles in building resentment in Khurda.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Now let's delve into the events that sparked the uprising on March 29, 1817. Can anyone recall what happened during this pivotal moment?
The Paiks attacked the police station, right?
Exactly, Student_4! This coordinated attack marked the beginning of widespread rebellion. What factors do you think contributed to the success of the initial uprising?
I guess they had the support of the local zamindars and ryots?
That's a great point! Unity among local inhabitants played a crucial role. In addition, the presence of leaders like Buxi Jagabandhu galvanized the feels of rebellion against the British.
And wasn't there a campaign against paying rent?
Yes, the 'no-rent campaign' became a significant demonstration of defiance against colonial authority! Let’s remember these key events as they highlight how grievances can lead to organized resistance.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Now let's analyze how the British responded to the uprising. What measures did they implement when the situation escalated?
They declared Martial Law and captured the king.
Correct! Capturing Mukunda Dev II was a strategic move to demoralize the rebels. How do you think the uprisings impacted British policy in Orissa?
I think they had to change their approach after realizing how strong the resistance was.
Absolutely, Student_1! After the uprising was largely contained, the British adopted a more lenient approach, easing some oppressive practices. This shows how resistance can force authorities to reconsider their policies.
In summary, the British reaction included repression through military force but ultimately led to some reforms in their governance. Now, can anyone suggest why this might be significant for future uprisings?
It probably set a precedent for later movements against British rule.
Exactly! The Khurda uprising was a notable precursor to future anti-colonial movements in India.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The Khurda Uprising, occurring before the significant uprising of 1857, was initiated in response to colonial policies that adversely affected local rulers and the populace. The grievances included loss of territory by the local king Mukunda Dev II and oppressive revenue collection led by the British, culminating in armed resistance led by Buxi Jagabandhu and the Paiks, which temporarily captured significant grounds but was ultimately suppressed.
The Khurda Uprising in 1817 was a significant precursor to the larger revolt of 1857 in India and reflects the growing discontent with British colonial policies that started building throughout the 19th century.
Khurda, a small kingdom in Orissa, had its governance disrupted by British annexation and increasing economic exploitation. After losing territories and authority over the Jagannath Temple, Mukunda Dev II organized resistance against the British to reclaim his lost influence and rights, leading to widespread dissatisfaction among the local populace.
The British administration’s harsh policies, such as the resumption of service tenures and increased revenue demands without regard for local agricultural capacities, fueled resentment. Many local leaders suffered losses, while the masses faced severe financial strain and displacement.
The uprising began on March 29, 1817, when the Paiks attacked government establishments, marking a surge of rebellion. Under Buxi Jagabandhu, the resistance obtained substantial support, causing alarm among British authorities.
The British imposed Martial Law, captured the king, and attempted to quell the uprising violently. Despite initial successes in suppressing the rebellion, local resistance continued under Buxi Jagabandhu until his surrender in 1825. Eventually, the British revised their approach, introducing reforms in administration and easing some oppressive policies, but the uprising remains a critical chapter in Orissa’s resistance against colonialism.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Much before the event of 1857, there had taken place another event of a similar nature at a place called Khurda in 1817. Here, it would be instructive for us to study that event and reflect on how resentment against the colonial policies of the British had been building up since the beginning of the 19th century in different parts of the country.
Khurda, a small kingdom built up in the late 16th century in the south-eastern part of Orissa, was a populous and well-cultivated territory consisting of 105 garhs, 60 large and 1109 small villages at the beginning of the 19th century.
In the early 19th century, Khurda was a well-established kingdom in Orissa, known for its agricultural resources and local governance. This section introduces the historical context of the Khurda Uprising by highlighting the region's significance and setting the stage for understanding the grievances against British colonial policies. The mention of villages and garhs (fortified settlements) indicates a structured and populated area that would have felt the impacts of colonial rule.
Imagine a small, tight-knit community where farmers rely on their land for livelihood. Now, if an outside force imposed harsh laws and regulations on their farming practices, the community would begin to feel resentment. This is similar to how the people of Khurda felt under British rule.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
His king, Raja Birakishore Dev had to earlier give up the possession of four parganas, the superintendence of the Jagannath Temple and the administration of fourteen garjats (Princely States) to the Marathas under compulsion. His son and successor, Mukunda Dev II was greatly disturbed with this loss of fortune. Therefore, sensing an opportunity in the Anglo-Maratha conflict, he had entered into negotiations with the British to get back his lost territories and the rights over the Jagannath Temple.
The kings of Khurda, specifically Raja Birakishore Dev and his son Mukunda Dev II, faced territorial losses and diminished influence, particularly over important cultural sites like the Jagannath Temple. As a tactic to regain power during conflicts like the Anglo-Maratha War, Mukunda Dev II thought alliances with the British could be beneficial, but this ultimately led to disappointment when the British failed to restore his rights after taking control of Orissa in 1803.
Think about a local ruler in a small town who lost control over key local events and traditions due to outside influences. The ruler may try to make alliances with those in power to regain control, only to find that these promises are empty. This reflects the situation faced by the rulers of Khurda.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Soon after taking over Khurda, the British followed a policy of resuming service tenures. It bitterly affected the lives of the ex-militia of the state, the Paiks. The severity of the measure was compounded on account of an unreasonable increase in the demand of revenue and also the oppressive ways of its collection.
The British administrative policies heavily impacted the local militia known as the Paiks, leading to loss of livelihoods for former soldiers and an increase in financial burdens due to harsh tax collection practices. This discontent grew as the British failed to accommodate the region's economic realities, leading many locals to resent their rule.
Imagine a community experiencing a sudden tax hike that strains everyone’s finances without any improvement in services. People in this community would likely feel frustrated and look for ways to resist those in charge, similar to how the Paiks reacted.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The uprising was set off on 29 March 1817 as the Paiks attacked the police station and other government establishments at Banpur killing more than a hundred men and took away a large amount of government money. Soon its ripples spread in different directions with Khurda becoming its epicenter.
The Khurda Uprising began when the local militia, the Paiks, launched a surprise attack on British government facilities. This violent confrontation marked a turning point, as it encouraged widespread participation from local communities who were equally frustrated by British policies, rapidly transforming the uprising into a broader rebellion against colonial rule.
Consider a situation where a small protest against unfair laws leads to a larger movement when others join in. This is how the initial attack by the Paiks sparked a wider uprising, similar to how one small act of defiance can motivate many others to take action.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
However, outside Khurda it was sustained by Buxi Jagabandhu with the help of supporters like the Raja of Kujung and the unflinching loyalty of the Paiks until his surrender in May 1825. On their part, the British henceforth adopted a policy of ‘leniency, indulgence and forbearance’ towards the people of Khurda.
While the uprising faced significant military action from the British, local leader Buxi Jagabandhu continued to sustain the fight for several years. Ultimately, the uprising's failure prompted the British to revise their approach, focusing on more lenient policies to stabilize the region and placate the local population, rather than enforcing harsh rules.
Imagine a workplace where employees rebel against strict rules, leading to a re-evaluation of those rules by management. The management might then decide to implement more flexible policies to maintain harmony and avoid conflict, akin to the British adjusting their tactics in Khurda.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Resentment Against Colonial Rule: The feelings of discontent that led to the uprising stemmed from oppressive taxation and loss of local governance.
Role of Local Leaders: Leaders like Buxi Jagabandhu played crucial roles in rallying support and leadership during the uprising.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
The uprising began when the Paiks attacked the police station at Banpur, showcasing coordinated resistance against British authorities.
Buxi Jagabandhu declared Mukunda Dev II their ruler, indicating the local people's desire for rightful governance against colonial rule.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In Khurda, the people did rise, against British tax that was full of lies.
Once upon a time in Khurda, a king lost his rights to a foreign sight. His people felt dismayed, their voices betrayed, they rose up in arms, refusing to be swayed.
Riders 'P.A.I.K.': P for Paiks, A for attack, I for uprising, K for king's return.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Khurda Uprising
Definition:
An armed rebellion that took place in 1817 against British colonial rule in the Khurda region of Orissa, driven by local grievances.
Term: Mukunda Dev II
Definition:
The king of Khurda who sought to reclaim lost territories from British rule and led resistance efforts during the uprising.
Term: Buxi Jagabandhu
Definition:
The hereditary Military Commander and leader of the Khurda Uprising, rallying local support against the British.
Term: Paiks
Definition:
The local militia in Khurda who participated actively in the uprising against British authority.