Practice Intellectual Property and Plagiarism - 17.3.3 | 17. Ethical Considerations of Using Generative AI | CBSE Class 9 AI (Artificial Intelligence)
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

Define plagiarism in your own words.

💡 Hint: Think about what it means to take credit for someone else’s ideas.

Question 2

Easy

What does intellectual property refer to?

💡 Hint: It includes inventions, art, music, etc.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is plagiarism?

  • Taking credit for your own work
  • Using someone else’s work as your own
  • Discussing a piece of work

💡 Hint: Consider what you have learned about originality.

Question 2

True or False: AI can never commit plagiarism.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Think about AI's capabilities to generate content.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Evaluate a recent incident where generative AI content was struck down for copyright infringement. What were the elements that led to this conclusion?

💡 Hint: Focus on the uniqueness of the work and its relationship to existing works.

Question 2

Propose a set of guidelines for ethical AI use in creative industries that balance innovation with respect for existing works. Include practical examples.

💡 Hint: Think about how respect for creators can coexist with innovation.

Challenge and get performance evaluation