Practice Why TAC is the Ideal Input for Code Generation - 8.1.2 | Module 8: Code Generation - Building the Machine's Instructions | Compiler Design /Construction
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does TAC stand for?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how it relates to the number of addresses in its instructions.

Question 2

Easy

Name one defining characteristic of TAC.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider how complex operations are represented in simpler terms.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does TAC stand for?

  • Three-Address Code
  • Two-Address Code
  • Four-Address Code

πŸ’‘ Hint: Remember, the name directly describes the number of addresses.

Question 2

TAC simplifies the task for a code generator by breaking down high-level constructs. True or False?

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the benefits it provides to the compiler.

Solve and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Given a snippet of high-level code, write the corresponding TAC instructions and then convert them into assembly language commands.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Focus on sequentially accessing memory and variables.

Question 2

Discuss the trade-offs between using TAC versus AST for complex code generation tasks.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Reflect on how complexity in each representation affects performance.

Challenge and get performance evaluation