Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we're talking about the cycle time calculation, which is critical for estimating productivity in earthmoving projects. Can anyone tell me what we mean by 'ideal conditions'?
I think ideal conditions refer to situations where everything works perfectly as planned, like operating for a full hour.
Exactly! Ideal conditions often mean 60 minutes of effective working time. However, if a bulldozer only works for 50 minutes, we need to apply what factor?
That's the job efficiency correction factor, right?
Yes! The job efficiency correction factor adjusts our calculations to reflect actual operations. Remember the acronym 'JE' for Job Efficiency.
So how do we calculate that?
Good question! You would divide the actual working minutes by 60. So, in this case, it would be 50 divided by 60, which equals approximately 0.83.
What does that mean for productivity?
It means our productivity estimate will be reduced by this correction factor. Great discussion on job efficiency!
Next, let's consider soil density. Who remembers the standard density for our productivity curves?
It's 1365 kg/m³.
Correct! Now, if our project soil is denser, say 1750 kg/m³, what must we do with our calculations?
We need to apply a correction factor.
Right again! And why is this adjustment necessary?
Because denser soil makes it harder for the bulldozer to push, reducing productivity.
Exactly! The correction for increased soil density would typically be less than 1, indicating reduced productivity. Always keep soil density in mind!
Moving on to operator skill. If the operator’s skill is average versus excellent, what impact does that have?
The productivity would go down since the less skilled operator might not use the machine efficiently.
Exactly! This is another situation where we apply a correction factor of less than one. Can anyone give me an example of a material type affecting productivity?
Non-cohesive silty sand?
Spot on! So, how do both operator skill and material type affect productivity when combined?
We multiply correction factors together, right?
Precisely! This combined effect may significantly reduce our expected productivity. Always remember each factor's impact and to apply it systematically!
Let's talk about visibility and slope. If visibility is poor, what impact does that have on the bulldozer's operation?
It would probably decrease productivity since the operator can't see well.
Correct! Visibility adjustment is another correction factor, usually less than one. How about slope? What happens when moving downhill?
The productivity increases since gravity helps!
Exactly! For downhill slopes, the correction factor might be greater than one, enhancing productivity. Can someone summarize how we evaluate these factors graphically?
By referring to the curves from the equipment handbook that relate factors to productive output!
Right again! Excellent work discussing visibility and slope influences!
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
In this section, various factors influencing the cycle time calculation in earthmoving operations are analyzed. These include soil density variations, operator skills, gear transmission modes, and correction factors like job efficiency and the type of material being moved. Correction factors are crucial for adjusting maximum production values derived from manufacturer curves to align with actual project conditions.
In earthmoving operations, accurately calculating cycle time is essential for estimating productivity and costs. This section specifically addresses the correction factors needed to adjust theoretical productivity values based on ideal curve conditions (such as those provided by equipment manufacturers) to the realities of specific job site conditions.
These correction factors ultimately ensure a more accurate estimation of the unit cost of the earthmoving operation, essential for effective project budgeting and bidding.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And hope you remember these curves are valid only for these ideal conditions. So, 60 minutes hour but in your project in this problem we found that the machine is working for 50 minutes an hour.
This part highlights that the productivity curves used in calculations depend on ideal conditions. Here, one ideal condition is that the machine operates for an entire hour (60 minutes). However, in the current project scenario, the machine only works efficiently for 50 minutes per hour. This difference is crucial because it will affect the final productivity results due to reduced active work time.
Imagine a student who can only study effectively for 50 minutes before losing focus, even though a full study session is an hour long. Just like the student’s effective study time needs to be considered for proper planning, the machine's working time must be adjusted to calculate productivity accurately.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, you are supposed to apply the job efficiency, you have to apply the correction factor accordingly.
Given that the machine operates less than the ideal amount of time, we need to apply a correction factor to account for decreased efficiency. This means adjusting the expected productivity from the ideal curves based on real-world conditions such as operating time and other factors like soil density and operator skill.
Think of a chef preparing a meal. If they work in an understocked kitchen (like working under less than ideal conditions), the meal's preparation and cooking time increase. They might need to adjust their plan considering their limited resources, just like adjusting the productivity expectations based on working conditions.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
But this curve value is applicable for a soil density of 1365 kg per meter cube. So, in our case the soil density is given us 1750 kg per meter cube in bank state that is to be noted.
The productivity curve that was initially used assumes a specific soil density of 1365 kg/m³. However, in our case, the soil density is actually higher at 1750 kg/m³. This discrepancy implies that the bulldozer will face more resistance when working with denser soil, which will reduce its productivity. Therefore, this requires us to apply another correction factor to adjust for this difference.
Imagine pulling a wagon filled with rocks versus one filled with feathers. The rock-filled wagon represents denser soil, which requires more effort to move. Just as the increased weight affects how fast you can pull the wagon, the denser soil affects bulldozer productivity.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The curve was drawn for excellent operator skill. So, in our problem the operator skill is average. So, accordingly you have to choose the correction factor and apply.
Since the ideal productivity curves assume an 'excellent operator' handling the machinery, the actual average skill level of the operator requires a correction. An average operator will likely work less efficiently than an expert, necessitating a decrease in expected productivity through a correction factor.
Think of a sporting event. If a professional athlete (excellent operator) competes, the expectations are high. However, if an amateur (average operator) competes instead, you would expect less impressive performance, similar to how the bulldozer's output changes based on operator proficiency.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Similarly, the material type, material type is non-cohesive silty sand, so that will definitely reduce the productivity.
The type of material being moved greatly affects productivity. Non-cohesive silty sand does not hold together well, which can influence how the bulldozer operates. This material's properties may slow down operations or require different techniques, further necessitating correction.
Think about trying to move a pile of dry leaves versus a pile of water-soaked mud. The mud is heavier, stickier, and much harder to move. Like in construction, the bulldozer's efficiency is impacted by the nature of the material it is handling.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Visibility is poor in the problem what we have discussed. So, that will reduce your correction factor, the productivity will reduce obviously we are working for 50 minutes an hour, so accordingly the correction factor should be applied.
Poor visibility conditions can hinder the operator's ability to navigate and control the bulldozer effectively. This can reduce productivity, requiring a correction factor to account for reduced efficiency during operations in such conditions.
Consider driving in foggy weather; it is more challenging to see the road. Consequently, you might drive slower to stay safe. Similarly, reduced visibility affects the bulldozer's efficiency, making it crucial to adjust productivity expectations.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, in this problem we are moving down the hill, so the grade percentage is -15%. So, accordingly you have to choose the curve supply by the manufacturer.
Adjusting for the grade percentage—here indicated as -15% (downhill)—can actually enhance productivity. The slope contributes to the machine's effectiveness as gravity assists the bulldozer in moving material down the slope, thus necessitating another adjustment to the correction factor to reflect this advantage.
Think of riding a bike downhill versus uphill. Riding downhill feels easier and faster due to gravity helping you. In construction, moving down a slope similarly boosts the bulldozer's efficiency, showing how changes in terrain can impact operations.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, we can compare both only when the volume is the same type of measure, but one volume is in bank state other volume is expressed in loosen state.
To accurately apply the soil density correction, we must convert the bank state soil density (1750 kg/m³) to a loose state density value to compare it with the productivity curve's standard (1365 kg/m³). This ensures we understand how denser soil impacts machine performance and productivity calculations.
When you weigh a bag of flour at the grocery store, the weight can vary depending on whether the flour is compacted or loose. In construction, just as measuring flour correctly is critical for a recipe, accurately comparing soil densities is vital for determining bulldozer productivity.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, after you estimate the productivity you are asked to estimate the unit cost of proposed earthmoving operation per bank meter cube.
Once productivity is estimated, the next step is calculating the cost per unit of work done (in bank meter cube terms). This involves dividing the total cost of machine operation by the estimated productivity to understand the financial aspect of the earthmoving task.
It's like budgeting for a homemade pizza. If the total cost of ingredients is $20 and you can make 4 pizzas, the cost per pizza is $5. Similarly, here it’s crucial to know how much each unit of earthmoving costs to plan effectively.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Cycle Time Management: Understanding cycle time is crucial in productivity estimation.
The Significance of Correction Factors: These factors adjust theoretical productivity to reflect real conditions.
Job Efficiency: Effectively understanding job efficiency allows for better accuracy in estimations.
Importance of Soil Density: Soil properties play a major role in affecting equipment performance.
Operator Skill Impact: The operator’s craft can either enhance or decrease output efficiency.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
If a bulldozer's maximum productivity is 114.68 loose cubic meters per hour under ideal conditions but is working in a situation with a job efficiency of 83%, the effective productivity is reduced to 95.20 loose cubic meters per hour.
For a project with a soil density of 1750 kg/m³ (compared to the standard of 1365 kg/m³), a correction factor is applied, resulting in a productivity estimate lower than initially calculated.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
If visibility is low and soil is dense, productivity decline can be quite immense!
Imagine a bulldozer struggling uphill in foggy conditions. The operator, unsure of the path, stops often, leading to decreased productivity - a perfect lesson on how conditions matter!
Remember the acronym C-JSOM (Costs, Job Efficiency, Soil, Operator, Material) for factors influencing cycle time.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Cycle Time
Definition:
The total time taken to complete a cycle of operation, including dozing, returning, and maneuvering time.
Term: Correction Factor
Definition:
A numerical adjustment applied to the productivity estimate to reflect actual working conditions.
Term: Job Efficiency
Definition:
The ratio of actual working time to theoretical maximum working time, expressed as a percentage.
Term: Soil Density
Definition:
The mass per unit volume of soil, which can affect the productivity of earthmoving operations.
Term: Operator Skill
Definition:
The proficiency level of the operator, which influences the overall effectiveness and efficiency of equipment operation.