Practice Summary - 4.9 | 4. Model and Work with Graph Data Structures | Data Structure
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What are the two primary representations of graphs?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how each representation works.

Question 2

Easy

Define a vertex in graph terminology.

πŸ’‘ Hint: What does each point in a graph represent?

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does BFS stand for?

  • Breadth-Fast Search
  • Breadth-First Search
  • Breadth-Forward Search

πŸ’‘ Hint: Look at the keywords in the acronym.

Question 2

True or False: An adjacency matrix is space efficient for sparse graphs.

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about how many edges exist compared to vertices.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

You have a graph representation for a city and want to find the quickest route from point A to point B that includes at least two specific points. Which algorithms would you consider and why?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Consider using a combination of searches for multiple points.

Question 2

How would you explain the importance of using an adjacency list over an adjacency matrix in a scenario where you frequently add or remove edges?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Reflect on how each representation handles changes to the graph's structure.

Challenge and get performance evaluation