Practice Difference between Python 2 and Python 3 - 11.3.1 | 11. More about range() | Data Structures and Algorithms in Python
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβ€”perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does the range(5) function return in Python 3?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the starting point and the absence of a stopping point.

Question 2

Easy

How would you create a sequence counting down from 10 to 1?

πŸ’‘ Hint: What must you include for the sequence to decrease?

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

In Python 2, what does range(5) return?

  • A list of numbers from 0 to 4
  • A range object
  • An error

πŸ’‘ Hint: Think about the difference in output between the versions.

Question 2

True or False: range(1, 10, 2) generates 1, 3, 5, 7, 9.

  • True
  • False

πŸ’‘ Hint: What does the step argument control?

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Write a function that accepts parameters for start, stop, and step to create a range in Python 3. Then demonstrate how this works with a real example.

πŸ’‘ Hint: Focus on how to use the range function to output your desired sequence.

Question 2

Create a loop that counts down from 10 to 1 and print each number using range. What should the output be?

πŸ’‘ Hint: Use the negative step to encourage the countdown creation.

Challenge and get performance evaluation