Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we’re introducing directed acyclic graphs, or DAGs. Can anyone tell me what makes a graph directed and acyclic?
A directed graph has edges that point in a specific direction, right? And acyclic means there are no cycles?
Exactly! A directed acyclic graph, or DAG, proceeds from one vertex to another without forming cycles. This means that DAGs can be topologically sorted. What do you think topological sorting does?
It likely orders the vertices so that for every directed edge from vertex U to vertex V, U comes before V in that order.
Correct! This order indicates dependencies. For instance, in a course schedule, we can only take a course after completing its prerequisites. This leads us to our focus today: finding the longest path in a DAG.
Let's consider courses represented by nodes and prerequisites as edges. How would we use this representation to find the minimum number of semesters needed to complete all courses?
We can look at the longest path in the graph, because it shows us the cumulative dependencies.
Exactly! The longest path indicates how many semesters it may take if each course requires a semester. Remember, sometimes we think of it as a chain of dependencies. Suppose we have a path where course A requires B and C. What happens if we complete B earlier?
We can still take A whenever its prerequisites are done, but we still have to wait for C!
Yes, and that’s a key point in understanding why we focus on the longest path in this context. The total semester requirement derives from that path’s length.
Now let’s discuss how to calculate the longest path. What do you think happens in a naive computation approach?
We might look at each vertex and check all incoming edges to find the longest path?
Exactly! This can be inefficient because we would need to repeatedly scan through edges. What about incremental computation—how does that differ?
We calculate the longest path as we go along. Once we compute a vertex's value, we can use that to easily compute connected vertices without redoing work.
Spot on! Incremental computation allows us to save time and effort, which is essential in larger graphs.
Lastly, let's think of practical applications of the longest path in DAGs. Can anyone think of scenarios outside of academic courses?
How about scheduling projects where certain tasks must be completed before others?
Or managing workflows where some tasks depend on the completion of prior tasks?
Both good examples! We see that finding the longest path can help optimize schedules by identifying bottlenecks in dependencies.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section delves into the problem of determining the longest path in DAGs, highlighting the significance of topological ordering. It discusses how naive methods can be inefficient and contrasts them with incremental computation, which allows for more efficient path calculations by leveraging previous computations.
In this section, we focus on identifying the longest path in Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs). A DAG is defined as a directed graph that contains no cycles, allowing us to topologically order its vertices. This ordering helps solve problems like course prerequisites in an educational context, where we must determine the minimum number of semesters required to complete all courses given their dependencies. The naive approach to finding the longest path involves examining all incoming edges for each vertex, while the incremental approach calculates the longest path as we create the topological order. By doing this, we can compute paths more efficiently without redundant scans, ultimately relating the longest path to the minimum number of steps required to complete a set of tasks or courses.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
If I do it naively then I will write out my vertices in some topological order and now when I come to this vertex and I want to compute its longest path, I will look at in my graph all the incoming edges and they will all be from vertices which appear before. So, I can take the value here, the value here, the value here and then take its maximum and then add here. So, actually we will see that you do not need to do this backward, you can actually do it forward.
In a naive approach to compute the longest path in a directed acyclic graph (DAG), you first need to establish a topological order of the vertices. Once you have this order, for each vertex, you then look backward at all the incoming edges to its prerequisites. The key point here is that as you look at each vertex, you take the maximum value from the lengths of paths leading to it and add one to account for the current vertex.
However, this backward scanning for incoming edges can be inefficient, especially if many vertices have multiple incoming edges. The naive approach requires multiple scans throughout the list of vertices, leading to potentially higher computational time, especially for large graphs.
Imagine tracking your progress in learning subjects where each subject has prerequisites. If you followed a backward route, you'd have to keep looking back to the subjects you learned before, making notes of which were completed to verify how far you can progress in your studies. Instead, if you took a forward approach, you could simply follow your current progression through your studies without constantly looking back, which is more efficient.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, we can actually incrementally compute the value at i k as you are going forwards. Because, going backward requires you to scan this list and look for all the incoming neighbours. So, we will kind of implicitly do this longest path calculation along with topological sort side by side, as we will see in the next example.
In contrast to the naive method, the incremental approach to compute the longest path is much more efficient. Instead of looking backward, as you process each vertex in the topological order, you can simultaneously update the longest path for its outgoing neighbors.
When you encounter each vertex, you start with the assumption that the longest path to each vertex is zero. As you process the vertices, whenever you reach a new vertex, you can compute its longest path based on the longest paths already calculated for its predecessors. This forward-moving method allows real-time updating and reduces the need for redundant scanning of the graph.
Think of this like building a road map as you drive. Instead of stopping to check each road you passed, you update your GPS in real-time as you drive forward. Each time you reach a new intersection, your GPS updates the best routes based on the new information from the roads you’ve just traveled. This forward-thinking avoids the headache of having to go back and confirm information.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, here is an example in which we are going to compute the longest path as we are computing the topological order. So, as before the red numbers I given as the vertices are used for topological sort and they denote the indegrees.
In the incremental approach, as we compute the topological order for the vertices of the DAG, we simultaneously calculate the longest path. The indegrees (the number of incoming edges for each vertex) are tracked and updated as we traverse the graph. When we process each vertex, we not only adjust its indegree but also use its longest path to further calculate the paths to its outgoing neighbors. This ability to calculate paths while creating a topological order eliminates extra steps of revisiting vertices.
Imagine planning the steps of a project. As you determine the sequence of tasks (topological order), you're also tracking how long each task will take based on the time it takes to finish the tasks that lead into it. Hence, every time you finish a task, you immediately adjust your overall project timeline without having to go back to reassess previous tasks.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, this has complexity order n squared for the same reason that we had found that topological short with adjacency matrix or order n squared. Because we have the nested loops in order to scan all the neighbours.
The complexity of incrementally computing the longest path through a DAG in conjunction with the topological sort can be analyzed similarly to that of the topological sort alone. When implementing this method using an adjacency matrix, it requires quadratic time, O(n²), due to the nested loops necessary to visit each vertex and its neighbors.
However, using an adjacency list and more efficient data structures can reduce the complexity to linear time, O(n + m), where n is the number of vertices and m is the number of edges, making the algorithm significantly faster for larger graphs.
Returning to our project example, organizing tasks by complexity is much like simplifying a workflow. If you try to manually update your timeline and dependencies on a whiteboard (analogous to using a nested approach), it takes much longer than using software that automatically adjusts timelines and dependencies based on your inputs, significantly speeding up the entire process.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
DAG: A structure without cycles that allows for a clear dependency path.
Topological Sorting: A method to order tasks according to their prerequisites.
Longest Path: Represents the cumulative dependencies in a DAG.
Incremental Computation: A method to calculate paths without redundant work.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
In a course schedule where course C depends on courses A and B, the longest path would dictate the earliest semester C can be started after taking A and B.
In project management, a longest path must consider tasks that are dependent on others to determine the project completion time.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In a directed graph, with no way back, acyclic paths stay on track.
Imagine a mentor guiding students through courses: they must complete A and B before C, illustrating dependencies.
DAG: Decide And Graduate, as the order helps avoid getting stuck.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG)
Definition:
A directed graph that contains no cycles, allowing for a topological order of vertices.
Term: Topological Sorting
Definition:
An arrangement of vertices in a directed graph such that for every directed edge from vertex U to vertex V, U comes before V.
Term: Longest Path
Definition:
The path in a graph that has the maximum number of edges, important for understanding dependencies in DAGs.
Term: Incremental Computation
Definition:
A method that uses previously computed values to calculate new results more efficiently.