Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Today, we are going to delve into the longest common subword problem. Can anyone tell me what falling under the term 'subword' means?
I think it means a segment or sequence within a word.
Exactly! A subword is a contiguous segment from a string. For example, in the words 'secret' and 'secretary,' the 'secret' is a subword. Now, our goal is to calculate the length of the longest common subword between two strings.
Are we just focusing on determining the length, not the actual subword?
Correct! We first want to find the length. Later, we can retrieve the actual subword from this length.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Let's talk about the brute-force method. How do you think we might approach this problem using brute force?
We would check every possible starting position in both strings until we find a match?
Exactly! We try every possible starting point and check how long the match extends. However, what do you think is a downside of this approach?
It sounds like it would take a lot of time, especially for longer strings!
Precisely! The time complexity is O(m * n), meaning it can become inefficient for larger inputs.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Now, let’s discuss how we can improve our solution using dynamic programming. Does anyone know how dynamic programming works?
I think it involves breaking down problems into smaller subproblems?
Exactly! We can solve our problem by defining a relationship: if characters match, we build upon previous matches. If they don’t, what do we assume the length to be?
It would be zero, right?
Correct. Let’s remember! We also need boundary conditions—when one string is empty, the length is zero. This structure will help us build the solution efficiently.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Now we will implement our dynamic programming solution. Shall we begin by discussing how to initialize our table?
We set all entries to zero initially since no matches have been established yet.
Exactly! Next, as we fill out the table, we look at matches and their previous entries. What happens if we find a match?
We take the value from the previous diagonal cell and add one.
Correct! After populating the table, how do we determine our final answer?
We find the maximum entry in the table, which represents the longest common subword length.
Perfect summary! This will effectively optimize our approach compared to brute force.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section explores the longest common subword problem, defined as finding the maximum length of matching segments between two strings. It details a brute-force method's inefficiencies and how dynamic programming can optimize this process. The explanation includes recursive relations and boundary conditions for accurate calculations.
Dynamic programming is employed to solve the longest common subword problem, which aims to identify the length of the longest segment (subword) shared between two strings. The section begins by defining the problem clearly, emphasizing the need to compute length rather than the subword itself. An initial brute-force algorithm is discussed, showcasing an O(m * n) performance due to the need to compare every possible starting position in the two sequences.
To optimize this, the section presents a recursive relation that captures the essence of the problem: when two characters match, the length of the longest common subword can be derived from the lengths of the subwords following those characters. Conversely, when there is no match, it is zero. The significance of base cases—where one of the strings is empty—is highlights, as they dictate that the length cannot exceed zero.
Dynamic programming is described in detail, where a table is used to store intermediate results, allowing for efficient retrieval and computation of the overall length. Such a strategy not only reduces redundant computations but also presents a structured way of approaching the problem sequentially, ensuring that all required subproblems are solved in an organized manner.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Let us now turn to the problem of finding Common Subwords and Subsequences between two sequences. The first problem we look at is what is called a longest common subword problem. We are given two words and want to find the length of the longest common subword between them. A subword is just a segment, for instance, with the words 'secret' and 'secretary', the longest common subword is 'secret' with length 6.
In this chunk, we are introduced to the longest common subword problem, which involves finding a segment that appears in two different words. The term 'subword' refers to a continuous part or segment of a string. Examples include finding 'isect' in 'bisect' and 'trisect' or 'sec' in 'bisect' and 'secret'. The main aim here is not just to find the common subword itself but to determine its length.
Think of it like searching for common phrases in two different books. For example, if one book says 'The quick brown fox' and another book says 'A quick brown dog', the common phrase 'quick brown' appears in both. Here, the focus is on identifying that commonality.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We have two words a_0 to a_m and b_0 to b_n. We want to check segments starting with positions a_i and b_j, and see if reading k letters from both results in the same segments. The aim is to find the length of the longest such segment.
This chunk formalizes the problem by defining the structure of the two words. Each word consists of characters indexed from 0 to its respective length. By checking every possible starting position in both words, we can compare segments of length k to identify if they match. The focus remains on determining the maximum length of these matching segments.
Imagine two strings of beads – one is red and the other blue. You want to find a sequence of beads that matches between the two strings. You would take different starting points and compare until you find the longest sequence that looks alike.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
A brute force algorithm could involve trying every position a_i and b_j and matching letters until a mismatch is found. This could take O(m * n^2) due to the number of comparisons made.
This chunk discusses a basic method to solve the problem: the brute-force algorithm. It suggests checking each character in the first word against every character in the second word, continuing to compare until a mismatch occurs. This method is inefficient because the potential combinations of starting positions lead to a large number of comparisons, specifically O(m * n^2), where m and n are the lengths of the two words.
Imagine trying to find the longest matching sequence of puzzle pieces between two sets by examining each piece one by one. It would take a long time to check each piece of each set until you find the longest matching sequence.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
If we have a_i == b_j, then we check the next positions i+1 and j+1, since there's a common subword of one character. Otherwise, we declare the common subword length as 0.
Here, we learn about the inductive nature of the problem. If two characters match, we can extend our search for a common subword to the next positions. If they do not match, then we cannot extend a common subword from that point, and it resets to zero. This insight allows us to approach the problem more efficiently than brute force by building on known results incrementally.
It’s like a game where you only score points when two players starting from the same position make matching moves. If they falter or one moves differently, they lose their score from that round, and the tally resets. But if they match, they can keep going and build their score higher.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
A dynamic programming solution is established through subproblems, LCW(i, j), which relies on checking if a_i equals b_j.
In this chunk, we discuss moving from the idea of brute force to dynamic programming. The longest common subword (LCW) is identified as a subproblem where the solution depends on previously computed values. The algorithm builds up from smaller problems, utilizing the results of previous computations to efficiently solve larger problems.
Think of this like assembling a jigsaw puzzle. Instead of starting from scratch with each piece, you remember which pieces fit together as you work on the final picture, thus making the overall process faster and more organized.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
After filling the table, we need to determine the entry with the largest value representing the length of the longest common subword.
Once we compute the values in the dynamic programming table, we look for the largest entry, which indicates the length of the longest common subword. This process is performed systematically by analyzing each computed value until we identify the maximum.
Imagine you are collecting points while playing a video game. At the end of the game, you check your score against your friends to see who scored the highest. The maximum score indicates the best performance, just like we identify the longest common subword by finding the maximum value in the table.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
To find the longest common subword itself, it can be easily retrieved using the maximum length entry and following the paths in the dynamic programming table.
This chunk explains how we can retrieve the actual longest common subword once the length is identified. By backtracking through the table, we can trace back the matching characters to reconstruct the subword.
It’s like retracing your steps back to a location from a map – once you reach your destination (the maximum length), you can follow the routes you’ve taken (the paths in the table) to return or find out what you passed by.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The dynamic programming version is presented with code detailing how to evaluate the table column by column.
In the final chunk, the implementation details are discussed, explaining how the algorithm is structured in code. It elaborates on filling the dynamic programming table and updating maximum values as comparisons are made. Understanding this implementation is crucial for applying the theoretical knowledge into practical coding.
Think of writing down a recipe. Each step incorporates previous steps and at the end of the recipe, you arrive at the final dish. Similarly, coding this algorithm step by step builds up the solution methodology, leading to the final answer effectively.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Brute-force Algorithm: A straightforward method that checks all possible combinations, leading to a high time complexity.
Dynamic Programming Approach: An optimized algorithmic technique that stores results of subproblems to avoid recomputation.
Recursive Relationship: The logic that defines how the solution can be built upon previous results.
Boundary Conditions: Special cases that dictate the results of computations when reaching the edges of the problem.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
For the words 'director' and 'secretary', the longest common subword is 'ec', which has a length of 2.
Between 'bisect' and 'trisect', the longest common subword is 'isect', with a length of 4.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
To find what's the same, within strings, not just their name, count the subwords, play the game, to find the length is our main aim.
Imagine two treasure maps, leading to hidden gold. The longest path without any forks represents our longest common subword. We must strategize how we navigate both maps to find the longest route!
LCS - Length Checking Segments: Each segment checked leads us closer to our longest common subword.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Dynamic Programming
Definition:
A method for solving complex problems by breaking them down into simpler subproblems, storing results to avoid computing the same results multiple times.
Term: Longest Common Subword
Definition:
The maximum length of contiguous matching segments within two strings.
Term: Recursion
Definition:
A programming technique in which a function calls itself to solve smaller instances of the same problem.
Term: Base Case
Definition:
The simplest instance of a problem that can be solved directly without further recursion.
Term: Time Complexity
Definition:
A computational complexity that describes the amount of time it takes to run an algorithm as a function of the length of the input.