Practice Challenges of Integrating DRR and CCA - 4 | 1. Disaster Recovery and Build Back Better | Disaster Preparedness &Planning - Vol 2
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does DRR stand for?

💡 Hint: Think about what it means to reduce disaster risks.

Question 2

Easy

Name one challenge in integrating DRR and CCA.

💡 Hint: Consider the variety of people involved in disaster and climate management.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What primarily focuses on short-term, immediate disasters?

  • Climate Change Adaptation
  • Disaster Risk Reduction
  • Environmental Management

💡 Hint: Think about what 'risk reduction' implies.

Question 2

True or False: CCA involves only government policies without local input.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider who is part of community efforts.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Using a specific case study, analyze how the integration of DRR and CCA can be implemented in a coastal community vulnerable to climate change.

💡 Hint: Look for examples of past disasters and how community adaptations were made.

Question 2

Examine how poverty influences vulnerability in disaster scenarios and propose integration strategies to address this issue.

💡 Hint: Consider the socio-economic factors that exacerbate disaster impacts.

Challenge and get performance evaluation