Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we're discussing why community involvement is so important in disaster risk management. Can anyone tell me why we need communities to participate?
I think because they know their own problems best?
Exactly! Local people have the best insights into their challenges. This empowers them in the process of defining how they want to participate.
But how do communities usually get involved if outsiders are making the plans?
Great question! Often, outsiders define participation criteria without consulting the community, which may lead to ineffective strategies. It's vital for communities to have their voices heard.
What happens if they don’t have a say?
When communities are excluded, the planned initiatives often fail because they're not tailored to the actual needs and capabilities of the people affected.
So, how can we make them feel included?
We can encourage a user-based approach where communities define their own criteria. This builds ownership and trust!
To wrap up, remember that when communities lead their participation, they create solutions that work.
Let's explore the criteria for community participation in disaster risk management. What do you think these criteria should include?
Maybe trust and mutual understanding?
Yes! Mutual trust and ownership are crucial. Communities must feel they own the process. What about outcome-based criteria?
Would that be about how effective the strategies are after implementation?
Exactly, Student_2! Successful implementation is an outcome we should measure. It's a cycle; effective participation leads to positive outcomes, which can lead to further engagement.
Now, let’s talk about the user-based approach to community participation. How does this differ from traditional methods?
Isn’t it about letting the communities decide how they participate?
Correct! In this approach, the community defines participation criteria based on their realities. Why is this empowering?
Because it gives them control over their situation and engagement!
Absolutely! When communities define their participation criteria, they produce tailored solutions that reflect their needs and capacities.
Moving to our case study, the Wa region in Ghana faced significant climate impacts. How did they actively participate?
They created calendars to show learning about climate changes?
Yes! By developing their own calendars, locals depicted how climate patterns have shifted, demonstrating their understanding of these changes.
So they’re not just victims; they’re active participants?
Precisely! They transitioned from being passive recipients to active participants, which is crucial for effective disaster management.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
This section emphasizes that for successful disaster risk management, communities must be empowered to determine how they wish to participate. Traditional methods often dictate participation from the outsider's perspective, neglecting the community’s voice and experiences.
Effective disaster risk management, particularly in communities affected by climate change, 'requires community involvement as a core principle'. This section discusses the importance of engaging community members in defining their level of participation in risk management strategies. Traditional models often see outsiders (researchers, facilitators, and NGOs) dictating how communities should engage, which can lead to ineffective outcomes.
Key points include the recognition that communities should determine their criteria for participation—what it means to them, how they wish to engage, and the outcomes they envision. A case study from the Wa region in Ghana exemplifies these principles: residents crafted calendars reflecting climate impacts, showcasing their understanding of shifting weather patterns and illustrating how they can contribute to disaster management strategies effectively.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So bringing the people into the driving seat is really important this is the celebrations of our after finishing this and Dharavi community led action plan for flood disaster risk management.
This chunk highlights the significance of involving the community in disaster management. By placing community members in key roles ('the driving seat'), they can take ownership and responsibility for managing risks associated with floods. The phrase 'celebrations' suggests that engaging the community fosters a sense of achievement and partnership in tackling these challenges together.
Imagine a sports team where the coach makes all the decisions without discussing strategies with the players. If players were involved in decision-making, they might feel more motivated and provide insights based on their unique experiences on the field, leading to better outcomes.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
But the question remains in question of participations that why people participate?. These are the criterias right and these the right hand side you can see that, left hand side the process-based criteria and right hand side you can see some of the references that from where we can found that this is our proposed argued for community participation.
This chunk raises the essential question of why people choose to participate in community initiatives. It indicates the existence of two sets of criteria for participation: process-based and outcome-based. The process-based criteria relate to how participation should occur, and the outcome-based criteria concern the expected results of such involvement. This distinction is essential for understanding effective community engagement.
Consider a school where students are asked to contribute to their learning environment. If the process is transparent (like having regular meetings to discuss ideas) and the outcomes are clear (like improved facilities), students are likely to be more motivated to participate.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
What is missing is that we are seeking communities participations but community had never been involved in defining what is the meaning of participations.
This chunk suggests that often, communities are asked for their participation without having the opportunity to define what that means for them. This lack of input can lead to frustration and ineffective participation because their true needs and definitions may not be considered by external planners or authorities.
Think of a restaurant that creates a new dish without consulting its customers about their preferences. If the customers had been involved in the decision, the new dish would likely be more appealing and suited to their tastes, leading to higher satisfaction.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We are saying that instead of we define the criteria of participation it is possible that community themselves will define what is the meaning of participations what are the criterias of participations so we call this is user based approach.
This chunk introduces a user-based approach to participation, where community members define their own criteria for involvement. By allowing communities to set their own parameters for participation, they can engage in a way that feels authentic and meaningful to them, leading to stronger connections and results.
Imagine a group of friends planning a trip. Instead of one person planning everything, they all contribute ideas based on what they enjoy and can agree upon. This collaborative planning results in a trip that everyone is excited about, rather than one that only one person thought would be fun.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We conducted this study in Ghana a West African country and one of the most climate change impacted a disaster-prone community particularly the upper region, Wa region, the northern part of Ghana is around four hundred kilometre from the Accra their capital city and is one of the poorest region of this country.
Here, the focus is on Ghana's upper Wa region, which faces significant climate-related challenges such as floods and droughts. This context emphasizes the importance of community involvement in disaster management efforts in vulnerable areas, illustrating how localized strategies can address specific issues faced by communities.
Picture a small town in a flood-prone area. If the town's leaders work together with residents to identify flood risks and create plans to mitigate them, the community is more likely to feel prepared and resilient than if plans are imposed from outside without local insight.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
This calendar were developed by the farmers or the local residents by themselves they are depicting, describing the impact of climate change they can sense they can feel...
This chunk describes how local residents in the Wa region created their own calendars to track climate patterns and changes. Such tools help them understand the shifting climate, recognize patterns, and adapt their farming practices accordingly. This grassroots observation of climate change highlights the valuable local knowledge that can inform and guide community-led initiatives.
Imagine farmers in a town who notice that their crops are not growing as before due to changes in the weather. They begin to keep track of when it rains and when it's dry, adjusting their planting times based on these new patterns, similar to how residents create a calendar to adapt.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Community Engagement: Vital for effective disaster management, giving local insights on needs.
Mutual Trust: Essential for the community to own the participation process.
User-Based Approach: Communities define their participation and criteria for successful outcomes.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
In Ghana's Wa region, the community developed a climate impact calendar to illustrate their lived experience with changing patterns.
When communities led their participation, programs like flood management were more effective and suited to their needs.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Community's voice, let them choose, in disaster management, win or lose!
Once in Ghana, villagers made a weather chart, showing how changes played a part in their heart. Their hands wrote stories of rains and of drought, leading to resilience that can't be bought.
M.U.C. - Mutual trust, User-based approach, Community engagement - vital for disaster management!
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Community Involvement
Definition:
Engagement of community members in planning and executing projects that affect them.
Term: UserBased Approach
Definition:
A strategy where communities define their criteria for participation in projects.
Term: OutcomeBased Criteria
Definition:
Measurements to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of community participation.
Term: Mutual Trust
Definition:
The confidence developed between community members and facilitators during participation.