Practice Response to Tsunami and Kashmir Earthquake - 2.1 | 6. Earthquake Resistant Models | Disaster Preparedness & Planning - Vol 4
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does G+1 stand for in building design?

💡 Hint: Think about how many floors are included in this term.

Question 2

Easy

Name one traditional material used for earthquake-resistant structures.

💡 Hint: Consider materials that are flexible and strong.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does G+1 in building design refer to?

  • Ground plus one floor
  • Ground plus two floors
  • Two floors only

💡 Hint: Consider how many levels are indicated by the term.

Question 2

True or False: Communities should not be involved in disaster recovery efforts.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Think about who has the most understanding of local needs.

Solve 2 more questions and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Design a framework for a community reconstruction project after a major earthquake, detailing how local materials can be integrated alongside modern techniques.

💡 Hint: Consider all elements that promote sustainability and resilience.

Question 2

Critically analyze the effectiveness of traditional construction techniques in modern disaster resilience.

💡 Hint: Focus on historical results compared to modern requirements.

Challenge and get performance evaluation