Practice Phases of the Funding Process - 6.2 | 5. FOREC Council Objectives | Disaster Preparedness &Planning - Vol 5
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does the acronym FOREC stand for?

💡 Hint: It's a council aiming to promote transparency.

Question 2

Easy

Name one role that NGOs play in the funding process.

💡 Hint: Think about their role in local communities.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the primary goal of the FOREC council?

  • Increase corruption
  • Promote transparency
  • Ignore community needs

💡 Hint: Consider the values they aim to enforce.

Question 2

True or False: The emergency phase focuses only on housing reconstruction.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Think about the immediate actions taken after a disaster.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Evaluate the effectiveness of the decentralized approach in ensuring that community needs are met during reconstruction. What factors may enhance or hinder this process?

💡 Hint: Think about real-life examples of decentralized governance.

Question 2

Propose strategies to strengthen the collaboration between the CGOs and local communities for more effective development outcomes. What would be key indicators of success?

💡 Hint: Consider what drives successful community involvement.

Challenge and get performance evaluation