Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Let's start with the condition (A ∩ C) ⊆ (B ∩ C). Based on this, how would we prove that A is a subset of B?
Could we begin by substituting a specific set for C?
Exactly! If we set C = A, we find that A ∩ A equals A, implying A ⊆ (B ∩ A).
So, if an element x is in A, it must also be in B since it’s in A ∩ B.
Right! Therefore, we conclude A ⊆ B. Remember, this logical flow is crucial for understanding further relations.
Can we apply this method to other set relations as well?
Yes! This type of reasoning is foundational in proving various properties in set theory.
What memory aid can we use to remember this?
An easy mnemonic is 'A is part of B (A ⊆ B)’ to remind you of the proof we went through today.
To summarize, we showed how to prove A ⊆ B using a substitution into the set intersection condition, allowing us to reason through more complex relationships later.
Now, let's explore symmetric relations. What defines a symmetric relation?
If (i, j) is in R, then (j, i) must also be in R.
Correct! And how about anti-symmetric relations?
In an anti-symmetric relation, if both (a, b) and (b, a) are present, then a must equal b.
Precisely! Let’s practice determining the conditions for forming symmetric and anti-symmetric relations.
How do we find the number of symmetric relations on a set of n elements?
Good question! We can form relations from the upper triangular part of an n x n matrix. The count of subsets from these highlights the combinations of symmetric relations.
So, should we focus on combinations to solve these?
Exactly! Let’s summarize: symmetric relations require mutual element inclusion, while anti-symmetric only allow pairs under specific conditions.
Let’s dive into counting various types of relations. What relation are we interested in when both properties are true?
That would be when we consider symmetric and anti-symmetric properties.
Correct! With both requirements, what can we conclude about the relations possible?
We can only include the diagonal elements, right?
Yes! Thus, there’s only one relation possible when both properties hold: the diagonal itself.
What if we consider irreflexive as well?
Great thought! An irreflexive relation would not allow diagonal elements, leading to zero valid relations.
Can we summarize the numbers related to these properties?
Absolutely! For relations that are both symmetric and anti-symmetric, we found just one. Conversely, for irreflexivity combined with the others, it fundamentally limits our outcomes.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
In this section, the lecture introduces various properties of sets and relations in discrete mathematics. Key topics include demonstrating set inclusion through logical proofs and determining the number of symmetric, anti-symmetric, reflexive, and irreflexive relations on given sets. It emphasizes the interplay between different properties of relations to illustrate the underlying mathematical principles.
In Discrete Mathematics, understanding sets and their relationships is pivotal. The lecture begins by discussing two sets, A and B, demonstrating how the condition (A ∩ C) ⊆ (B ∩ C) implies A ⊆ B. It further explores the implications of relationships between sets, such as whether A ∩ B is a subset of C based on universal quantifications. Various exercises address how many symmetric, anti-symmetric, reflexive, and irreflexive relations can be formed on a set of n elements, demonstrating the principles of combinatorial counting in the context of set theory. Ultimately, the section emphasizes the axiomatic understanding of how relations are not only defined but also how different properties can coexist or contradict in mathematical reasoning.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
You are given that arbitrary sets A and B. And the sets A and B as such that, this condition holds namely (A ∩ C) ⊆ (B ∩C) for any set C that you consider. If that is the case and you have to show that A ⊆ B, so you are given the premise that the (A ∩ C) ⊆ (B ∩ C) for any set C.
We begin with two sets A and B. The condition states that for any set C, the intersection of A with C is a subset of the intersection of B with C. What this implies is that if this condition holds for all sets C, we can infer something about the relationship between A and B.
- Our goal is to show that A is a subset of B, denoted as A ⊆ B. This means that every element in A should also be found in B.
- To demonstrate this, we can substitute C with A itself, so we analyze (A ∩ A) ⊆ (B ∩ A).
- This simplification leads to A ⊆ (B ∩ A), which indicates that all elements of A are contained within the common elements of A and B.
Imagine you have two boxes: Box A with fruits and Box B with different fruits. The condition indicates that if you were to look at both boxes and any other box you can think of, if all the fruits in Box A that match with the third box can also be found in Box B, then it suggests that all the fruits in Box A generally belong to Box B too.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Set Theory: The foundation of discrete mathematics dealing with collections of objects.
Set Inclusion: Understanding how one set can be contained within another.
Properties of Relations: Exploring symmetric, anti-symmetric, reflexive, and irreflexive properties.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Example of symmetric relation: If (1,2) is in R, then (2,1) must also be in R.
Example of anti-symmetric relation: If (1,2) and (2,1) are in R, then 1 must equal 2, which is not possible.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In symmetric ties, the pairs will swap; find (a, b) and you'll also find (b, a) on the map.
Imagine two actors on stage. If one actor (a) talks to another (b), the conversation must be reciprocated (b back to a), or the stage isn't symmetric.
To remember A is a subset of B, think: A is inside the tree of B, where all leaves are within.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Set
Definition:
A collection of distinct objects or elements.
Term: Subset
Definition:
A set in which all elements are contained in another set.
Term: Symmetric Relation
Definition:
A relation where if (a, b) is in R, then (b, a) is also in R.
Term: Antisymmetric Relation
Definition:
A relation where if both (a, b) and (b, a) are in R, then a must equal b.
Term: Reflexive Relation
Definition:
A relation where every element is related to itself.
Term: Irreflexive Relation
Definition:
A relation where no element is related to itself.