Professional Courses
Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Categories
Interactive Games
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Typing
Memory
Math
English Adventures
Knowledge
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Introduction to Proof by Cases
Unlock Audio Lesson
Welcome, everyone. Today, we're discussing proof by cases, a powerful method in mathematics. Can anyone tell me what a proof by cases involves?
Is it when we break down a statement into several cases to prove it?
Exactly! Proof by cases involves evaluating each possible scenario individually to show that the proposition holds true. What do you think is a common type of statement we might use this for?
Maybe for statements that are universally quantified?
Yes! Universal statements often require a case-by-case analysis. Remember, if we can't find an example that disproves it, we strengthen our position. Can anyone think of an example where proof by cases might be needed?
How about proving something like n² ≥ n for all integers n?
Great example! We can break that down into cases where n could be negative, zero, or positive.
Disproving Universally Quantified Statements
Unlock Audio Lesson
Next, we’ll explore how to disprove a universally quantified statement. Who can tell me how we do that?
By finding a counterexample, right?
Exactly! A counterexample is an instance where the statement fails. For example, if we claim every positive integer can be expressed as a sum of squares, what might be a good counterexample?
What about 3? It can't be expressed like that.
Correct! Finding that one case where the statement does not hold is sufficient to declare it false. Can anyone explain why just giving one example is insufficient for proving universal claims?
Because we may have skipped over other numbers that could still fulfill the condition?
Exactly! Proof requires us to verify the condition for all elements in the domain, not just a few specific cases.
Examples of Proof by Cases
Unlock Audio Lesson
Now, let’s dive into an example of proof by cases. Let's prove that n² ≥ n for any integer n. What cases should we consider?
We can look at n = 0, n > 0, and n < 0.
Correct! Let’s start with n = 0. What do we find?
0² = 0, so it holds true.
Good! Now, for n > 0?
For positive integers, n² will always be larger than n.
Correct again! And for n < 0?
Even for negative integers, n² is always positive while n is negative, so it holds as well.
Perfect! Since all cases have been established as true, we conclude that n² ≥ n for all integers.
Without Loss of Generality
Unlock Audio Lesson
Now, let's discuss 'without loss of generality', often abbreviated as WLOG. Who knows why this is helpful in proofs?
Maybe because it simplifies our cases?
That's right! It allows us to prove a case by assuming one condition without compromising the proof. Can anyone give me an example of where we might apply WLOG?
In proving properties of pairs of numbers, like if x and y are integers and we want to show their relation.
Exactly! If we assume x < y, we can proceed without losing generality in our proof. What would this allow us to do?
We can focus on just one arrangement, which streamlines the proof process!
Exactly! WLOG is powerful as it reduces duplicate cases, making proofs more efficient.
Constructive vs. Non-Constructive Proof
Unlock Audio Lesson
Finally, let’s differentiate between constructive and non-constructive proofs. Can anyone explain what each entails?
Constructive gives a specific example, while non-constructive doesn’t.
Exactly! Constructive proof provides a specific 'witness.' Let’s take the claim: there exists an integer that can be expressed in multiple ways. What's a known integer we can use?
1729, right? It's known as the Ramanujan number!
Correct! Now, for non-constructive proof, we argue logically that something exists without showing the example directly. Why might this be useful?
It works when we can logically deduce the existence without needing the exact example.
Exactly! Both methods are essential tools in mathematical reasoning, each with its strengths.
Introduction & Overview
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
Quick Overview
Standard
In this section, we delve into the proof by cases method, emphasizing its importance in establishing the validity of universal statements. The section illustrates how to disprove universally quantified statements through counterexamples and discusses the mechanism of proof by cases using various examples.
Detailed
In the Proof by Cases section, we focus on different proof strategies that help in validating propositions effectively.
A primary highlight is the disproof of universally quantified statements, achieved through counterexamples. For instance, claiming that all positive integers can be expressed as sums of squares would require a counterexample, such as the integer 3, to demonstrate its falsehood. The section emphasizes that while counterexamples are useful for disproof, they cannot serve as proof for universally quantified statements, which require a rigorous case-based examination.
The proof by cases method, also known as exhaustive proof, comes into play when a statement can be split into different cases, each of which must be proved valid. For example, to show that for every integer n, the statement n² ≥ n holds, we can examine three cases: n being zero, positive, or negative.
Additionally, the notion of 'without loss of generality' simplifies proofs by allowing one to focus on a specific case, with the understanding that similar reasoning applies to others. Finally, we explore structured proof mechanisms for unique existence and backward reasoning, highlighting their roles in constructing comprehensive mathematical arguments.
Youtube Videos
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Introduction to Proof by Cases
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
There is another proof mechanism which is called proof by cases. This is also called exhaustive proof. So if you want to prove an implication of the form p → q, where p and q are propositions, and if your proposition P can be decomposed into conjunction of various other propositions say n propositions, then p → q is logically equivalent to p → q, conjunction 1 p → q and so on.
Detailed Explanation
Proof by cases, or exhaustive proof, is a technique used to prove implications, specifically of the form p → q. In this context, p is a proposition that can be broken down into multiple cases (like p1, p2, ..., pn). To prove the implication, we show that for every case of p, the conclusion q holds true. This approach allows us to exhaust all possible situations to ensure that our conclusion is valid regardless of which specific case we are in.
Examples & Analogies
Think of proof by cases like planning for a picnic. You have three different weather scenarios to prepare for: sunny, rainy, and windy. For each type of weather, you have different things to pack (like sunscreen for sunny days, umbrellas for rain, and weight for windy days). If you can show that, regardless of the weather, you will have everything needed for a successful picnic, you have effectively planned for all cases.
Application of Proof by Cases
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So if I want to prove a statement that ꓯ n, if n is an integer, then n² ≥ n. This is a universally quantified statement. And now if I apply the universal generalization, you will be choosing an arbitrary n and you will be trying to prove that this property is true for that arbitrarily chosen integer. But now that arbitrarily chosen integer can be positive, it can be negative, it can be 0. You have 3 possible cases right for this arbitrarily chosen n.
Detailed Explanation
When applying proof by cases to the statement 'for all n, if n is an integer, then n² ≥ n', we first note that n can take three types of values: positive, negative, and zero. Therefore, we will examine each of these cases separately:
1. Case 1: When n is 0. In this case, n² = 0, which is equal to n.
2. Case 2: When n is a positive integer. In this case, any positive integer squared is greater than or equal to itself (e.g. 1² = 1, 2² = 4).
3. Case 3: When n is a negative integer. If n is negative, the square of any negative integer is always positive, which is greater than n.
Thus, in all three scenarios, the original statement holds true, confirming that n² ≥ n for any integer n.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine you're testing different types of fruits: apples, oranges, and bananas. You need to confirm a statement: 'All these fruits are sweet'. You check each type of fruit: apples are sweet, oranges are sweet, and bananas are sweet. Since you found sweetness in all fruit types, just like proving each case ensures correctness for n, you've shown that the statement holds true for the entire group.
Simplifying Cases with Without Loss of Generality
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
There is also something called without loss of generality, which we very often encounter while writing the proof. In short form they call it as w.l.o.g. So let me demonstrate we have what exactly I mean by without loss of generality.
Detailed Explanation
The phrase 'without loss of generality' (w.l.o.g) is used in proof by cases to streamline the process when the cases are symmetric. When performing a proof, if you find that two cases are equivalent (e.g. whether x is odd or y is odd), you can simply prove one case without needing to individually prove the symmetric counterpart. This simplifies the proof while still ensuring that all cases are accounted for.
Examples & Analogies
Think of cooking with two identical pots. If you want to show that either pot can hold boiling water without specifying which pot you use, you can say 'without loss of generality, let’s use pot A'. Since both pots are identical, it suffices to prove for pot A, conveying that the outcome will hold for pot B as well without additional proof.
Conclusion of Proof by Cases
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Since these are the three possible cases for your arbitrarily chosen n and you have chosen that p → q is true p → q is true and p → q is true.
Detailed Explanation
In conclusion, by proving that the implication p → q is true for all three cases of n (0, positive, and negative), we establish that the original statement is universally true. This comprehensive proof covers every possibility, ensuring the statement holds under all specified conditions. Thus, proof by cases is an effective strategy to validate universally quantified statements.
Examples & Analogies
Think of a toy company trying to ensure all toys can withstand different types of play—throwing, dropping, and scratching. By testing each type of play exhaustively, they confirm that all toys are robust under every condition, just as proof by cases confirms a mathematical statement holds under all defined scenarios.
Definitions & Key Concepts
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
-
Proof by Cases: A method that proves statements by examining all individual cases.
-
Counterexample: A single example that shows a universal statement to be false.
-
Without Loss of Generality: An assumption made in proofs that simplifies the process by allowing us to focus on one case.
-
Constructive Proof: A proof that provides a specific example to validate the claim.
-
Non-Constructive Proof: A proof that demonstrates existence without providing an explicit example.
Examples & Real-Life Applications
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Examples
-
An example of disproof is showing that 3 cannot be expressed as a sum of squares of two integers.
-
When proving n² ≥ n, we demonstrate it for the cases n < 0, n = 0, and n > 0.
Memory Aids
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
🎵 Rhymes Time
-
If one case fails the whole must fall, a counterexample discovers it all.
📖 Fascinating Stories
-
Once in a land of universal claims, a wise mathematician found counterexamples to shame. With proof by cases he split up the terrain, each one verified, ensuring the truth would remain.
🧠 Other Memory Gems
-
C-WOD: Counterexample, WLOG, Other cases, and Disproof - help remember the steps to prove or disprove.
🎯 Super Acronyms
PICS
- Proof by cases
- Important conditions
- Checking each scenario
- Simplifying with WLOG.
Flash Cards
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Glossary of Terms
Review the Definitions for terms.
-
Term: Proof by Cases
Definition:
A method of proving statements by considering all possible cases within a proposition.
-
Term: Counterexample
Definition:
An example that disproves a universally quantified statement.
-
Term: Without Loss of Generality (WLOG)
Definition:
A method used in proofs that allows one to assume a specific case for simplicity without losing generality.
-
Term: Constructive Proof
Definition:
A proof method that provides a specific example or witness to demonstrate that a statement is true.
-
Term: NonConstructive Proof
Definition:
A proof method that shows at least one solution exists without identifying a specific example.