Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we’re going to explore how to construct valid sequences in strictly increasing order. Can anyone tell me what we mean by valid sequences?
Are they sequences where each number is greater than the one before it?
Exactly! For a sequence to be valid, it has to be strictly increasing. If we denote our valid sequences by \(S(n)\), what can you tell me about the last term of our sequence?
It ends with \(n\), right?
Correct! The last term is indeed \(n\). Now, can you imagine how we can derive the count of these sequences?
Maybe by looking at different cases for the second last number?
Great thinking! The second last number can be anything from 1 up to \(n - 1\). Let's discuss the categories we can derive from this!
Now that we understand our last term, let's formulate the recurrence relation. If the second last number is 1, what happens?
We can have all valid sequences starting with 1 and ending with \(n-1\)!
Correct! So we can denote that as \(S(n-1)\). If the second last is 2, what do you think?
It would be sequences starting with 1, ending with 2.
Right! Can anyone summarize what the recurrence would look like?
It sounds like \(S(n) = S(n-1) + S(n-2) + ... + S(1)\).
Almost! We want it more compact; hence we derive \(S(n) = 2 * S(n-1)\).
Let’s discuss the need for initial conditions. Why do you think we need to specify \(S(1)\) and \(S(2)\)?
Because if we don't, our calculations might be incorrect?
Exactly! For \(S(1)\), there's only one valid sequence with one element. How many valid sequences will there be for \(S(2)\)?
One too, since we can only have `1,2`.
That's right! Now we established both initial conditions where both values are 1.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section explores a combinatorial approach to derive a recurrence relation for sequences in strictly increasing order, showcasing how to categorize valid sequences based on their last terms, leading to a more compact recurrence equation.
The section provides a detailed explanation of a combinatorial proof of identity involving the count of valid sequences arranged in strictly increasing order. Specifically, it focuses on constructing a recurrence relation for a function denoted as \(S(n)\), which counts the number of valid sequences ending with \(n\). A trivial recurrence relation is established based on the position of the second last number in the sequence, where different possibilities arise depending on whether this number is 1, 2, or \(n-1\).
The document constructs a more compact recurrence by categorizing the sequences into two main categories based on the second last number and interpreting the last number creatively. Through these categories, the relation \(S(n) = 2 * S(n-1)\) is derived, establishing a degree 1 recurrence equation that facilitates easier computation based on only one previous term. The section also emphasizes the need for two initial conditions arising from special cases when \(n=1\) and \(n=2\). This development aids significantly in understanding the number of increasing sequences and dives into further combinatorial problems, setting the stage for more complex identities and proof formulations.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The trivial recurrence condition for sequences is described as follows: Let \( A_n \) denote the number of valid sequences ending with \( n \). The recurrence can be given by:
\[ A_n = A_{n-1} + A_{n-2} + A_{n-3} \]
This is interpreted as follows: If the second last value in the sequence is 1, find all sequences starting and ending with 1 and append \( n \) to those sequences. This results in valid sequences that start with 1 and end with \( n \). This applies for valid sequences ending with 2 and \( n-1 \) as well, confirming that all discussed sequences are disjoint.
The recurrence condition for valid sequences describes how to count sequences based on the last value. Specifically, the function \( A_n \) counts the number of valid sequences that end with the value \( n \). The function can be expressed as the sum of the sequences ending with the previous numbers (i.e., \( n-1\), \( n-2\), and \( n-3\)). This relationship shows that if you add a valid sequence ending with 1, 2, or any other number less than \( n \), plus the value \( n \), you create a new sequence ending with \( n \). This captures all possible valid sequences, noting that the sequences formed in this way are disjoint from one another, meaning they don’t overlap.
Imagine you are building a tower with blocks, where the last block you place can only be a specific color representing a certain value. The blocks leading up to the last must be of colors representing values less than the last block's value. Thus, if your last block is red (representing 3), the blocks below could be blue (1) or green (2), and no two blocks can be the same color in this sequence due to the disjoint nature of the sequences.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
To find a more compact recurrence relation, we consider sequences where the second last term is \( n - 1 \) and how we can interpret the last sequence differently. The derived recurrence can be expressed as:
\[ A_n = 2A_{n-1} \]
This equation reduces complexity as now the nth term depends only on the previous term, providing a simpler calculation for the number of sequences.
In this approach, we focus on sequences where the second last term is specifically the value of \( n - 1 \). By changing our perspective on the last value, we recast sequences ending in \( n \) as though they end with \( n - 1 \). This transformation shows that we can define a more efficient recurrence since all sequences with a second last item being anything less than \( n - 1 \) will still yield valid increasing sequences. Therefore, counting all valid sequences merely from the last position's perspective becomes simpler, and we derive a single recurrence equation that just tracks one previous term instead of several.
Think about organizing a relay race. Initially, you must consider each runner who completed before the last runner. However, if you realize that the focus of your tracking only needs to be on the person handing the baton to the last runner, you simplify your notes to just keep track of one transition instead of every runner's details leading up to the end.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Despite the new recurrence relation being of degree 1, we still need two initial conditions such that \( A_1 = 1 \) and \( A_2 = 1 \). This ensures that we reach accurate counts of strictly increasing sequences starting with 1 and ending with 2. Such initial conditions are necessary because they set the groundwork for recurrences to function accurately.
Initial conditions are crucial in recurrence relations because they provide the starting values needed for further calculations. In the context of our recurrence, both \( A_1 \) and \( A_2 \) are set to 1 because there’s precisely one way to form a strictly increasing sequence using only the values 1 and 2 (i.e., just 1 or just 1 and 2 in increasing order). Without these base cases, the recurrence wouldn’t be able to produce valid total counts beyond just the formulations, leading to incorrect results.
Consider starting a new recipe. The initial ingredients (the first step) set the tone for the recipe's progress. If you don’t have the right first ingredient (your initial condition), you cannot complete the dish effectively!
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Base Cases: A valid sequence starts with a minimum length, such as 1 and 2, forming our basis for the recurrence.
Categories of Sequences: Sequences can be classified based on the second last term, providing ways to derive valid counts.
Compact Recurrences: A more refined view on the recurrence \(S(n) = 2 * S(n-1)\) allows easier computations.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Example 1: For \(n=1\), the valid sequence is just 1
. Hence \(S(1) = 1\).
Example 2: For \(n=2\), the valid sequence is just 1, 2
. Thus, \(S(2) = 1\) as well.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Count each way, let them grow, valid sequences in a row.
Once in a classroom, there was a sequence of friends who always wanted to grow taller - that's how they learned about increasing sequences!
Remember 'Silly Cats' to recall S(n) = 2S(n-1): Simply Count!
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Valid Sequence
Definition:
A sequence in which each term is strictly greater than the preceding term.
Term: Recurrence Relation
Definition:
An equation that recursively defines a sequence.
Term: Strictly Increasing
Definition:
A property of a sequence where each term is larger than the one before.
Term: Initial Conditions
Definition:
The base values required to begin solving a recurrence relation.