Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Welcome class! Today, we will discuss prime numbers. Can anyone tell me what a prime number is?
I think a prime number is a number that has only two factors: 1 and itself.
Correct! Now, can you give me an example of a prime number?
2 is a prime number.
Exactly! And what about numbers like 4 or 6?
They're composite numbers because they have more factors.
Great! Remember the mnemonic 'Prime = Prioritize Initials of Meaningful Entities' to help you recall this distinction. Let's move on to properties of primes.
Now, let’s dive into the naive algorithm for testing primality. Who can summarize how we check if a number is prime using this algorithm?
We check for divisors from 2 up to the square root of the number!
Correct! This approach is effective since a composite number will have at least one factor within that range. Can someone outline the steps involved in this process?
We start at 2, check each number up to the square root, and see if it divides evenly into our number.
Exactly right! And if we find a divisor, we’ve confirmed it’s composite. Otherwise, it’s prime.
What about its efficiency? Is it fast?
Great question! While it seems simple, it actually has an exponential time complexity, especially for large numbers. Remember, the greater the number of bits in p, the more divisions you'll end up performing.
As we've discussed, the naive algorithm isn't the most efficient. Can anyone tell me if there's a better alternative for testing primality?
The AKS algorithm, right? I heard it can test for primality in polynomial time!
Exactly! The AKS algorithm, proposed in 2002, is significant because it solves primality testing within polynomial time bound— a monumental step in number theory!
How do we know that polynomial time is practical, though?
Excellent inquiry! Polynomial time is generally considered efficient, allowing computations on large numbers in a reasonable timeframe. Remember, efficiency is crucial! It's much better than exponential time, which can quickly become infeasible for large integers.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section introduces the concept of prime numbers and their properties, including the naive algorithm for testing primality. It explains that this algorithm checks for factors of a number up to its square root but identifies its running time as exponential rather than polynomial, as well as referencing the AKS primality testing algorithm as a polynomial alternative.
This section introduces the concept of prime numbers, defining them as integers greater than 1 that have no positive factors other than 1 and themselves. The discussion includes properties of prime numbers, their unique representation as a product of prime powers (fundamental theorem of arithmetic), and the fact that there are infinitely many primes.
The naive algorithm checks whether a given number, p, is prime or composite. It asserts that if p is composite, it will have at least one divisor less than or equal to the square root of p. Thus, the algorithm iterates from 2 to to determine if any of these numbers divide p evenly. If a divisor is found, p is declared composite; if none is found, p is prime.
Though this method may seem straightforward, its time complexity is exponential in relation to the number of bits required to represent p, since it potentially involves divisions. The ultimate goal is to find a polynomial time algorithm for primality testing, which was addressed by the AKS algorithm developed in 2002, identifying that it falls within polynomial time complexities. This underscores the efficiency and significance of discovering efficient primality tests.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The algorithm uses the fact that if at all your given number p is a composite number then it will have a divisor which is less than equal to the square root of that number. The proof is very simple. So, let p be a composite number and since p is a composite number it will have a factor say a. The factor will be definitely greater than 1 because the definition of composite number is that it should have at least 1 factor different from 1 and the number itself. So, the factor a will be greater than 1 and less than p. And then since a is a factor I can say that there is a b such that a * b = p.
In this chunk, we learn about composite numbers and their properties. A composite number p must have divisors other than 1 and itself, meaning it has factors. If you have a factor a, then there is another factor b that, when multiplied by a, gives you p. Importantly, if a is a divisor, then one of the divisors (either a or b) must be less than or equal to the square root of p. This is essential for simplifying our primality testing algorithm.
Imagine you are at a sports competition with a group of people. If you have a team with 15 players, you can form smaller teams of 5 players each. If you check each smaller team (team of 5) against the total (15), you will always find the total to be divisible by at least one of these smaller teams (5). This is analogous to finding divisors of a composite number.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Based on this theorem, the naive algorithm is as follows. So, you are given an input number p you want to check whether it is prime or composite, you know that if at all it is composite, then it will have a factor within the range square root of that number. So, you try to check whether it has at least 1 factor within the range 2 to √p. You range over all possible values of i between 2 to √p and check whether the number i divides p or not. If you encounter any i then you can declare that p is composite, but if none of the numbers 2, 3, ..., √p divides your p then you can declare your p to be prime.
The naive algorithm for checking if a number p is prime involves testing potential divisors. You only need to check divisors up to the square root of p (√p). The steps are: First, list integers starting from 2 up to √p. For each integer i, check if it divides p without a remainder. This is done using the modulus operation (p mod i == 0). If you find any such i, p is composite. If you don’t find any factors in that range, then p is prime.
Think of trying to determine if a number is like finding out if a specific LEGO piece is a part of a larger build. You only need to check certain pieces (up to a point) to know if they fit in. If none of those pieces fit, you conclude that the piece can stand alone, just like concluding the number is prime.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, what is the running time of this algorithm? There are √p iterations and in each iteration, you are performing a division. Our measurement here will be how many divisions you are performing to declare whether a given number p is prime or not. So, you will need √p divisions. This may seem polynomial, but if p is represented by an n-bit number, the magnitude of √p can be as large as 2^(n/2). Therefore, this appears exponential in terms of the number of bits used to represent p.
When considering the efficiency of the naive algorithm, we find that it performs roughly √p iterations, each involving one division. However, if p is enormous, say a number represented with n bits, then √p becomes large as well (specifically 2^(n/2)). Thus, while it looks polynomial, it behaves exponentially with respect to the number of bits required to represent p, making it inefficient for large numbers.
Imagine you are searching for something in a vast library. Each shelf you check represents an iteration, and each book you open represents a division. If the library (number) is huge (high number of bits), even if you check half the books (square root), it still takes an enormous amount of time, showing it feels exponential as the size grows.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
You might be wondering if a polynomial time algorithm exists. It was a long-standing problem until the AKS primality testing algorithm was proposed in 2002. The AKS algorithm can determine if a number p is prime in polynomial time with respect to the number of bits needed to represent p. However, the details of the AKS algorithm will not be covered here.
The naive algorithm's inefficiency sparked interest in discovering better methods for testing primality. The AKS algorithm is a breakthrough because it operates efficiently in polynomial time based on the number of bits required for the number's representation. Understanding how it works requires more advanced mathematical knowledge, but its existence addresses the earlier concerns of finding a polynomial time solution.
Consider a detective trying to crack a case using old methods which consume a lot of time. Eventually, a new tool is invented that allows the detective to solve cases much faster. Similarly, the AKS algorithm represents a significant upgrade over naive methods, making the process of determining primality quicker and more efficient.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Prime Numbers: Numbers greater than 1 that have no other divisors except 1 and themselves.
Composite Numbers: Numbers that can be divided evenly by other numbers besides 1 and themselves.
Naive Algorithm: An algorithm that checks for factors of a number up to its square root to determine if it's prime.
Exponential Complexity: Complexity classification that indicates an algorithm will take time proportional to an exponential function of the input size.
Polynomial Time: A classification of an algorithm that means it runs in a time that is a polynomial function of the input size.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Example of a prime number: 7 (only divisible by 1 and 7).
Example of a composite number: 10 (divisible by 1, 2, 5, and 10).
Using the naive algorithm, to check if 29 is prime, we only check divisibility up to √29, which is approximately 5.39, so we check 2, 3, 4, and 5. None divide evenly, thus 29 is prime.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
A prime shines bright, with just two sides, 1 and itself, where truth resides.
Imagine a magical key (1) and a locked treasure chest (the number) that only opens when the chest has not been opened by any other keys (factors) except the magical key.
To find if a number is prime, check divisible from 2 to sqrt - it’s not a crime!
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Prime Number
Definition:
An integer greater than 1 that has no positive divisors other than 1 and itself.
Term: Composite Number
Definition:
An integer greater than 1 that is not prime, meaning it has divisors other than 1 and itself.
Term: Naive Algorithm
Definition:
A simple method for testing primality by checking divisors up to the square root of the number.
Term: AKS Algorithm
Definition:
A polynomial time algorithm for testing primality, developed in 2002.
Term: Time Complexity
Definition:
A computational analysis that describes the amount of time an algorithm takes to complete as a function of input size.