Content (3.7.2) - Model-based Design - Human Computer Interaction (HCI) Micro Specialization
Students

Academic Programs

AI-powered learning for grades 8-12, aligned with major curricula

Engineering Courses
Professional

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design

Certifications
Games

Interactive Games

Fun games to boost memory, math, typing, and English skills

Content

Content - 3.7.2

Introduction & Overview

Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.

Quick Overview

This section details the KLM analysis for the "Mouse-Centric Context Menu" copy-paste method. It outlines the user action sequence, translates it into KLM operators, and calculates an estimated execution time of 10.4 seconds plus system response time. \-- ## Medium Summary This section provides a meticulous KLM analysis of the mouse-centric copy-paste method, which exclusively uses right-click context menus. It breaks down the task into specific user actions, applies KLM operators (P, B, M, R) while adhering to 'M' heuristics, and presents a step-by-step calculation. The resulting estimated time of 10.4s + 2R highlights the relative inefficiency of this method for expert users due to extensive pointing and clicking overhead. \-- ## Detailed Summary # Detailed Summary of Interface Alternative 1: Mouse-Centric Copy-Paste (Context Menu) Analysis This section provides a granular analysis of the first interface alternative for the copy-paste task within the case study. This alternative exclusively utilizes mouse-based context menus for both copying and pasting, focusing on how an *expert user* would perform this routine, error-free task. The analysis is conducted using the Keystroke-Level Model (KLM). 1. **Method Description:** * The user performs the entire copy-paste operation by primarily interacting with the mouse and using right-click context menus. No keyboard shortcuts or toolbar buttons are involved in the core operation. 2. **User Action Sequence (Decomposition):** * **(Prerequisite: Text is already selected.)** * The user **mentally decides** to copy the selected text using the context menu. * The user **moves the mouse cursor** over the selected text. * The user **right-clicks** the mouse button (to open the context menu). * The user **mentally scans/identifies** the "Copy" option within the opened context menu. * The user **moves the mouse cursor** to the "Copy" option. * The user **left-clicks** the "Copy" option. * The **system processes** the copy command (brief system response occurs). * The user **mentally decides** where to paste the text. * The user **moves the mouse cursor** to the desired paste location. * The user **left-clicks** at the paste location (to set the insertion point). * The user **right-clicks** the mouse button (to open the context menu at the paste location). * The user **mentally scans/identifies** the "Paste" option within the context menu. * The user **moves the mouse cursor** to the "Paste" option. * The user **left-clicks** the "Paste" option. * The **system pastes** the text (system response occurs). 3. **KLM Operator Sequence (with 'M' Heuristics Applied):** * `M` (decide to copy using context menu) - *Rule 6: initiation of a major activity chunk* * `P` (move mouse to selected text) * `B` (right-click to open menu) * `M` (identify 'Copy' option in menu) - *Rule 1: not string terminator; Rule 2: not after R* * `P` (move mouse to 'Copy' option) * `B` (left-click 'Copy') * `R` (system processes copy) * `M` (decide where to paste, then decide to use context menu for paste) - *Rule 4: combine related Ms; Rule 2 not applicable immediately after R for a new chunk* * `P` (move mouse to paste location) * `B` (left-click to set insertion point) * `B` (right-click to open menu) * `M` (identify 'Paste' option in menu) - *Rule 1 & Rule 2* * `P` (move mouse to 'Paste' option) * `B` (left-click 'Paste') * `R` (system pastes text) 4. **Calculation of Estimated Execution Time for Alternative 1:** * **Count the operators:** * `M`: 4 * `P`: 4 * `B`: 6 (Note: `B` accounts for both right and left clicks as 0.1s each) * `R`: 2 * **Summing times (using average KLM operator values):** * `M` = 1.35s * `P` = 1.1s * `B` = 0.1s * `R` = Variable (represented as 'R' for comparison) * **Total Time = (4 \* M) + (4 \* P) + (6 \* B) + (2 \* R)** * Total Time = (4 \* 1.35) + (4 \* 1.1) + (6 \* 0.1) + 2R * Total Time = 5.4 + 4.4 + 0.6 + 2R * **Estimated Total Time (Alternative 1) = 10.4s + 2R** This analysis clearly illustrates the significant time cost incurred by a purely mouse-centric, context-menu-driven interaction for a routine task, primarily due to the numerous pointing and clicking actions required, along with the mental effort to navigate menus.

Standard

This section provides a meticulous KLM analysis of the mouse-centric copy-paste method, which exclusively uses right-click context menus. It breaks down the task into specific user actions, applies KLM operators (P, B, M, R) while adhering to 'M' heuristics, and presents a step-by-step calculation. The resulting estimated time of 10.4s + 2R highlights the relative inefficiency of this method for expert users due to extensive pointing and clicking overhead.

\--

Detailed Summary

Detailed Summary of Interface Alternative 1: Mouse-Centric Copy-Paste (Context Menu) Analysis

This section provides a granular analysis of the first interface alternative for the copy-paste task within the case study. This alternative exclusively utilizes mouse-based context menus for both copying and pasting, focusing on how an expert user would perform this routine, error-free task. The analysis is conducted using the Keystroke-Level Model (KLM).

  1. Method Description:
    • The user performs the entire copy-paste operation by primarily interacting with the mouse and using right-click context menus. No keyboard shortcuts or toolbar buttons are involved in the core operation.
  2. User Action Sequence (Decomposition):
    • (Prerequisite: Text is already selected.)
    • The user mentally decides to copy the selected text using the context menu.
    • The user moves the mouse cursor over the selected text.
    • The user right-clicks the mouse button (to open the context menu).
    • The user mentally scans/identifies the "Copy" option within the opened context menu.
    • The user moves the mouse cursor to the "Copy" option.
    • The user left-clicks the "Copy" option.
    • The system processes the copy command (brief system response occurs).
    • The user mentally decides where to paste the text.
    • The user moves the mouse cursor to the desired paste location.
    • The user left-clicks at the paste location (to set the insertion point).
    • The user right-clicks the mouse button (to open the context menu at the paste location).
    • The user mentally scans/identifies the "Paste" option within the context menu.
    • The user moves the mouse cursor to the "Paste" option.
    • The user left-clicks the "Paste" option.
    • The system pastes the text (system response occurs).
  3. KLM Operator Sequence (with 'M' Heuristics Applied):
    • M (decide to copy using context menu) - Rule 6: initiation of a major activity chunk
    • P (move mouse to selected text)
    • B (right-click to open menu)
    • M (identify 'Copy' option in menu) - Rule 1: not string terminator; Rule 2: not after R
    • P (move mouse to 'Copy' option)
    • B (left-click 'Copy')
    • R (system processes copy)
    • M (decide where to paste, then decide to use context menu for paste) - Rule 4: combine related Ms; Rule 2 not applicable immediately after R for a new chunk
    • P (move mouse to paste location)
    • B (left-click to set insertion point)
    • B (right-click to open menu)
    • M (identify 'Paste' option in menu) - Rule 1 & Rule 2
    • P (move mouse to 'Paste' option)
    • B (left-click 'Paste')
    • R (system pastes text)
  4. Calculation of Estimated Execution Time for Alternative 1:
    • Count the operators:
      • M: 4
      • P: 4
      • B: 6 (Note: B accounts for both right and left clicks as 0.1s each)
      • R: 2
    • Summing times (using average KLM operator values):
      • M = 1.35s
      • P = 1.1s
      • B = 0.1s
      • R = Variable (represented as 'R' for comparison)
    • Total Time = (4 \ M) + (4 \ P) + (6 \ B) + (2 \ R)
    • Total Time = (4 \ 1.35) + (4 \ 1.1) + (6 \* 0.1) + 2R
    • Total Time = 5.4 + 4.4 + 0.6 + 2R
    • Estimated Total Time (Alternative 1) = 10.4s + 2R

This analysis clearly illustrates the significant time cost incurred by a purely mouse-centric, context-menu-driven interaction for a routine task, primarily due to the numerous pointing and clicking actions required, along with the mental effort to navigate menus.

Detailed

Detailed Summary of Interface Alternative 1: Mouse-Centric Copy-Paste (Context Menu) Analysis

This section provides a granular analysis of the first interface alternative for the copy-paste task within the case study. This alternative exclusively utilizes mouse-based context menus for both copying and pasting, focusing on how an expert user would perform this routine, error-free task. The analysis is conducted using the Keystroke-Level Model (KLM).

  1. Method Description:
    • The user performs the entire copy-paste operation by primarily interacting with the mouse and using right-click context menus. No keyboard shortcuts or toolbar buttons are involved in the core operation.
  2. User Action Sequence (Decomposition):
    • (Prerequisite: Text is already selected.)
    • The user mentally decides to copy the selected text using the context menu.
    • The user moves the mouse cursor over the selected text.
    • The user right-clicks the mouse button (to open the context menu).
    • The user mentally scans/identifies the "Copy" option within the opened context menu.
    • The user moves the mouse cursor to the "Copy" option.
    • The user left-clicks the "Copy" option.
    • The system processes the copy command (brief system response occurs).
    • The user mentally decides where to paste the text.
    • The user moves the mouse cursor to the desired paste location.
    • The user left-clicks at the paste location (to set the insertion point).
    • The user right-clicks the mouse button (to open the context menu at the paste location).
    • The user mentally scans/identifies the "Paste" option within the context menu.
    • The user moves the mouse cursor to the "Paste" option.
    • The user left-clicks the "Paste" option.
    • The system pastes the text (system response occurs).
  3. KLM Operator Sequence (with 'M' Heuristics Applied):
    • M (decide to copy using context menu) - Rule 6: initiation of a major activity chunk
    • P (move mouse to selected text)
    • B (right-click to open menu)
    • M (identify 'Copy' option in menu) - Rule 1: not string terminator; Rule 2: not after R
    • P (move mouse to 'Copy' option)
    • B (left-click 'Copy')
    • R (system processes copy)
    • M (decide where to paste, then decide to use context menu for paste) - Rule 4: combine related Ms; Rule 2 not applicable immediately after R for a new chunk
    • P (move mouse to paste location)
    • B (left-click to set insertion point)
    • B (right-click to open menu)
    • M (identify 'Paste' option in menu) - Rule 1 & Rule 2
    • P (move mouse to 'Paste' option)
    • B (left-click 'Paste')
    • R (system pastes text)
  4. Calculation of Estimated Execution Time for Alternative 1:
    • Count the operators:
      • M: 4
      • P: 4
      • B: 6 (Note: B accounts for both right and left clicks as 0.1s each)
      • R: 2
    • Summing times (using average KLM operator values):
      • M = 1.35s
      • P = 1.1s
      • B = 0.1s
      • R = Variable (represented as 'R' for comparison)
    • Total Time = (4 \ M) + (4 \ P) + (6 \ B) + (2 \ R)
    • Total Time = (4 \ 1.35) + (4 \ 1.1) + (6 \* 0.1) + 2R
    • Total Time = 5.4 + 4.4 + 0.6 + 2R
    • Estimated Total Time (Alternative 1) = 10.4s + 2R

This analysis clearly illustrates the significant time cost incurred by a purely mouse-centric, context-menu-driven interaction for a routine task, primarily due to the numerous pointing and clicking actions required, along with the mental effort to navigate menus.

Audio Book

Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.

Case Study Alternative 1: Mouse-Centric Copy-Paste

Chapter 1 of 1

πŸ”’ Unlock Audio Chapter

Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience

0:00
--:--

Chapter Content

Method Description: The user performs the entire copy-paste operation using only the mouse and context menus. User Action Sequence (Decomposition): ...Mentally decide to copy... Move mouse... Right-click... Mentally scan / identify "Copy"... Move mouse... Left-click "Copy"... System processes... Mentally decide where to paste... Move mouse... Left-click at paste location... Right-click... Mentally scan / identify "Paste"... Move mouse... Left-click "Paste"... System pastes...

Detailed Explanation

This segment introduces the first of three interface alternatives for the copy-paste case study: a method relying solely on mouse interactions and right-click context menus. It provides a step-by-step breakdown of every micro-action an expert user would perform, from initial mental decisions to final system responses. This decomposition is the crucial first step for applying the Keystroke-Level Model (KLM).

Examples & Analogies

Imagine you're writing down every single motion and thought involved in opening a physical book, finding a specific paragraph, and then moving your finger to another page. This is exactly what we're doing for the mouse-centric copy-paste, meticulously detailing each step.

\--

  • Chunk Title: KLM Operator Sequence for Mouse-Centric Method
  • Chunk Text: KLM Operator Sequence (with 'M' Heuristics Applied): M (decide to copy)... P (move mouse)... B (right-click)... M (identify 'Copy')... P (move mouse)... B (left-click)... R (system processes copy)... M (decide where to paste)... P (move mouse)... B (left-click to set insertion point)... B (right-click to open menu)... M (identify 'Paste')... P (move mouse)... B (left-click 'Paste')... R (system pastes text).
  • Detailed Explanation: This chunk translates the detailed user action sequence into the specific Keystroke-Level Model (KLM) operators: Mental (M), Pointing (P), Button Press (B), and System Response (R). It explicitly shows where each operator is placed, particularly highlighting the application of 'M' heuristics to capture cognitive pauses. This sequence forms the basis for the quantitative time prediction.
  • Real-Life Example or Analogy: If your detailed recipe for baking a cake now has specific timing notes for each action: "1 minute for mixing flour (M), 5 seconds for adding eggs (P), 2 seconds for stirring (B)". This chunk is assigning those time-relevant labels to each step.

\--

  • Chunk Title: Calculating Time for Mouse-Centric Copy-Paste
  • Chunk Text: Count the operators: 'M': 4, 'P': 4, 'B': 6, 'R': 2. Summing times (using average values: M=1.35s, P=1.1s, B=0.1s): Total Time = (4 \ 1.35) + (4 \ 1.1) + (6 \* 0.1) + 2R = 5.4 + 4.4 + 0.6 + 2R = 10.4s + 2R.
  • Detailed Explanation: This segment demonstrates the final step of the KLM analysis for this alternative: calculating the total predicted execution time. It shows the summation of the individual operator times, resulting in 10.4 seconds plus two system response times. This numerical result quantifies the efficiency of this specific interaction method, providing a baseline for comparison with other alternatives.
  • Real-Life Example or Analogy: This is the final step in our recipe: adding up all the individual action times to get the total estimated cooking time for the entire cake. The 10.4 seconds is the overall time to perform the copy-paste using this specific method.

Key Concepts

  • Task Decomposition: Breaking down a complex task into discrete, measurable actions.

  • Operator Assignment: Mapping specific user actions to predefined KLM operators.

  • Quantitative Prediction: Deriving a numerical estimate of task completion time.

  • Efficiency Measurement: Using KLM to quantify the time cost of different interaction styles.

  • Examples

  • Example 1: If a user wants to select a file and click "Delete" from a right-click menu, the KLM sequence would include M P B (for open menu), then M P B (for select delete option), plus R.

  • Example 2: Observing that a user repeatedly navigates complex menus for a frequent task suggests that this "mouse-centric" approach is inefficient, similar to the copy-paste example.

  • Flashcards

  • Term: Mouse-Centric Copy-Paste Method

  • Definition: An interface alternative in the case study that performs copy-paste using only mouse actions and context menus.

  • Term: B (Button Press) Operator

  • Definition: A KLM operator representing a mouse click (left or right), with a typical time of 0.1 seconds.

  • Term: 10.4s + 2R

  • Definition: The estimated execution time for the mouse-centric copy-paste method in the KLM case study.

  • Memory Aids

  • Rhyme: Mouse menu's slow, with P and B's flow, the time will sure grow.

  • Story: Imagine trying to order food at a restaurant where every single step – from picking up the menu, to calling the waiter, to choosing an item – requires a specific, separate action and a pause for thought. That's the mouse-centric method: lots of small, distinct steps adding up.

  • Mnemonic: Many Points Bring Slow Results (M, P, B, S, R are key operators that sum up).

  • Acronym: MCM = Mouse-Centric Method.

  • Alternative Content

  • Analogy: Think of this method like navigating a website that requires multiple clicks and pop-up menus for every single action you want to take, even simple ones. It's functional, but you quickly realize how many steps you have to go through.

  • Visual Description: Picture a flowchart showing the user's hand moving the mouse, an arrow pointing to a right-click, a pop-up menu appearing, another arrow moving the mouse within the menu, and finally a left-click. Each of these visual steps would have KLM operator labels next to them, emphasizing the sequential nature and the number of distinct actions.

Examples & Applications

Example 1: If a user wants to select a file and click "Delete" from a right-click menu, the KLM sequence would include M P B (for open menu), then M P B (for select delete option), plus R.

Example 2: Observing that a user repeatedly navigates complex menus for a frequent task suggests that this "mouse-centric" approach is inefficient, similar to the copy-paste example.

Flashcards

Term: Mouse-Centric Copy-Paste Method

Definition: An interface alternative in the case study that performs copy-paste using only mouse actions and context menus.

Term: B (Button Press) Operator

Definition: A KLM operator representing a mouse click (left or right), with a typical time of 0.1 seconds.

Term: 10.4s + 2R

Definition: The estimated execution time for the mouse-centric copy-paste method in the KLM case study.

Memory Aids

Rhyme: Mouse menu's slow, with P and B's flow, the time will sure grow.

Story: Imagine trying to order food at a restaurant where every single step – from picking up the menu, to calling the waiter, to choosing an item – requires a specific, separate action and a pause for thought. That's the mouse-centric method: lots of small, distinct steps adding up.

Mnemonic: Many Points Bring Slow Results (M, P, B, S, R are key operators that sum up).

Acronym: MCM = Mouse-Centric Method.

Alternative Content

Analogy: Think of this method like navigating a website that requires multiple clicks and pop-up menus for every single action you want to take, even simple ones. It's functional, but you quickly realize how many steps you have to go through.

Visual Description: Picture a flowchart showing the user's hand moving the mouse, an arrow pointing to a right-click, a pop-up menu appearing, another arrow moving the mouse within the menu, and finally a left-click. Each of these visual steps would have KLM operator labels next to them, emphasizing the sequential nature and the number of distinct actions.

Memory Aids

Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts

🎯

Acronyms

MCM = Mouse-Centric Method.

🎨

Analogies

Think of this method like navigating a website that requires multiple clicks and pop-up menus for every single action you want to take, even simple ones. It's functional, but you quickly realize how many steps you have to go through.
- Visual Description

Flash Cards

Glossary

'M' Heuristics

Rules or guidelines used to determine the placement of Mental Preparation (M) operators in a KLM sequence.

Efficiency Measurement

Using KLM to quantify the time cost of different interaction styles.

Example 2

Observing that a user repeatedly navigates complex menus for a frequent task suggests that this "mouse-centric" approach is inefficient, similar to the copy-paste example.

Definition

The estimated execution time for the mouse-centric copy-paste method in the KLM case study.

Acronym

MCM = Mouse-Centric Method.

Visual Description

Picture a flowchart showing the user's hand moving the mouse, an arrow pointing to a right-click, a pop-up menu appearing, another arrow moving the mouse within the menu, and finally a left-click. Each of these visual steps would have KLM operator labels next to them, emphasizing the sequential nature and the number of distinct actions.

Next Activity

Practice Section

Apply what you’ve learned with hands-on practice.