Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Welcome back, everyone! Today, we continue discussing shear stresses in fluid flow, focusing on how they differ between laminar and turbulent flows. Can anyone remind me how shear stress works in laminar flow?
In laminar flow, shear stress is caused only by viscosity, right?
Exactly! In laminar flow, shear stress τ is directly proportional to viscosity μ and the velocity gradient. Now, what happens in turbulent flow?
There’s an additional component due to turbulence, making the total shear stress much larger.
Correct! This additional component is defined by eddy viscosity. It’s crucial to understand that while laminar flow has well-defined behavior, turbulent flow is influenced by chaotic fluctuations of the fluid particles.
Now, let’s talk about Boussinesq's model. Who can explain what eddy viscosity is and how it’s used?
Eddy viscosity refers to the additional viscosity in turbulent flow that accounts for energy transfer due to turbulence, right?
Exactly! We denote it as η. In turbulent flow, shear stress can be expressed as τ = η (du/dy). Can someone tell me how this differs mathematically from the laminar flow equation?
In laminar flow, it's τ = μ (du/dy). Here, we have a new coefficient, η, which varies with flow conditions.
Good point! Remember, η and the kinematic eddy viscosity ε are not fixed fluid properties; they depend on flow conditions. As we get closer to a wall, ε approaches zero.
Next, let’s explore Reynolds shear stress, introduced by Reynolds in 1886. Does anyone know how we express turbulent shear stress mathematically?
It's expressed as τ = -ρ u'v', where u' and v' are fluctuating velocity components.
Correct! The negative sign indicates a negative correlation. Do you remember what this implies about turbulent shear stress?
It implies that u' and v' are often negatively correlated, making τ a positive quantity overall.
Exactly! Understanding this relationship is pivotal for capturing the dynamics of turbulent flows.
Let’s delve into Prandtl's mixing length theory next. Can someone explain what mixing length (lm) entails?
Mixing length is the distance between fluid layers that allows for momentum transfer between them.
Yes! Prandtl linked mixing length to the velocity gradient. What equation represents this relationship?
Prandtl stated that u' is proportional to lm multiplied by the average velocity gradient.
Exactly! And do you remember how Prandtl defined lm concerning the distance from the wall?
He said lm is a linear function of distance from the wall, expressed as lm = k * y, where k is the von Karman constant.
Very well! With this understanding, we can derive formulations for turbulent shear stresses in practical scenarios.
Finally, how do these concepts apply to turbulent flow in pipes?
In turbulent flow within pipes, the main shear stress is dominated by turbulence, while viscous stresses are localized near boundaries.
Correct! So, we can simplify the shear stress equation significantly in these scenarios?
Yes, we can approximate the shear stress as τ ≈ ρ lm² (du/dy)².
Well done! Summarizing today's session, we covered the transition from laminar to turbulent flow, Boussinesq’s model, Reynolds shear stress, and how Prandtl’s theory helps us understand turbulent flows in pipes.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section focuses on the differences in shear stress between laminar and turbulent flows, emphasizing Boussinesq’s model which introduces the concept of eddy viscosity. It also discusses Reynolds shear stress and Prandtl’s mixing length theory, enhancing the understanding of turbulent shear stress in fluid mechanics.
This section provides insights into shear stresses in both laminar and turbulent flow, addressing key principles associated with hydraulic engineering. Initially, it clarifies that in laminar flow, shear stress is solely due to viscosity. However, in turbulent flow, a significant additional component arises from turbulence. This is encapsulated within Boussinesq’s model, highlighting how shear stress (τ) can be defined by including a new parameter known as eddy viscosity (η), leading to a revised equation: τ = η (du/dy).
The document then shifts to the concept of Reynolds shear stress as introduced by Reynolds in 1886, which describes turbulent shear stress in fluid layers. The relationship is explored mathematically but requires further derivation in future lessons. Subsequently, the section details Prandtl’s mixing length theory, which allows for the calculation of turbulent shear stress through a measurable quantity defined as mixing length (lm). Prandtl posited that this mixing length is the distance between fluid layers, contributing to momentum transfer.
Prandtl made a crucial assumption that mixing length varies linearly with the distance from a wall, leading to the formulation lm = k * y, where k (the von Karman constant) is approximately 0.4. The implications of these theories are important for understanding turbulent flow in hydraulic engineering, especially in applications like pipe flow, where turbulent shear stress dominates, and the effect of viscosity diminishes further from the boundary.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Welcome back to this lecture of laminar and turbulent flow. We have left the last lecture before introducing the topic of shear stresses in turbulent flow. So, we are going to continue with this particular topic.
This introduction sets the stage for understanding shear stresses, particularly in turbulent flow. The key point here is that shear stress in turbulent flow is more complex than in laminar flow. In the previous lecture, the discussion likely focused on laminar flow, which is characterized by smooth, orderly fluid motion. Now, the shift to turbulent flow brings in the concept of additional shear stress components due to turbulence.
Imagine a calm lake versus a river with rapids. The lake represents laminar flow—smooth and predictable—while the river with rapids represents turbulent flow—chaotic and unpredictable. Just as the river's turbulence creates different conditions for particles in the water, turbulent flow introduces increased shear stress.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We are going to talk about a model that is called Boussinesq’s model, where the total shear stress, in case of laminar flow it was due to the viscosity. But in a turbulent flow, there is an additional component of shear stress that happens because of the turbulence in the flow.
Boussinesq’s model explains how shear stress is not only a result of the fluid's viscosity in turbulent flow but also involves contributions from turbulence. In laminar flow, shear stress is straightforward—it comes from the fluid's viscosity. However, in turbulent flow, while viscosity still plays a role, turbulence causes an increase in shear stress due to chaotic fluid motion. Thus, total shear stress in turbulent flow is much greater than in laminar flow.
Consider mixing a thick syrup (laminar flow) and a bubble mixture (turbulent flow). The bubble mixture, like turbulent flow, has more dynamic movements and interactions, causing increased friction and resistance as you stir it compared to the syrup.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The shear stress due to turbulence is called eddy viscosity, which is denoted by eta (η).
Eddy viscosity is a conceptual tool used to quantify the extra shear stress appearing in turbulent flows. Unlike traditional viscosity that is constant for each fluid (like water), eddy viscosity varies with flow conditions. In turbulent flows, eddy viscosity helps to model the turbulence's effect on shear stress. It also shows that this stress can be significantly larger than what would be calculated using laminar viscosity alone.
Think of eddy viscosity as a sports crowd’s reactions. In a calm situation (laminar flow), reactions are predictable and orderly. However, during a high-energy play in a game (turbulent flow), reactions are erratic and amplified—much like how eddies increase the shear stress in the fluid.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, coming to what is Reynolds shear stress. So, Reynolds in 1886 gave expressions for turbulent shear stress between two fluid layers separated by a small distance.
Reynolds shear stress represents the average effect of velocity fluctuations in turbulent flow. It accounts for the interaction between different fluid layers moving at varying speeds, particularly in turbulent regimes. The expression for it involves the fluctuating velocity components, and it helps in deriving total shear stress in turbulent conditions. The concept highlights the increased complexity of turbulent flows compared to laminar ones.
Imagine two lanes of traffic on a highway moving at different speeds (different fluid layers). As vehicles switch lanes unpredictably (fluctuating velocities), this interaction can be seen as similar to how different fluid layers interact in turbulent flow, affecting overall traffic dynamics.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, there is a concept of Prandtl's mixing length theory. In 1925, Prandtl introduced the mixing length, which can be utilized to express shear stress in terms of measurable quantities.
Prandtl’s theory simplifies the calculation of shear stress in turbulent flow by relating it to a mixing length—the distance over which momentum from one fluid layer can effectively mix and influence another layer. By linking the fluctuating velocity components to this mixing length, it provides a practical way to estimate turbulent shear stress without requiring complex calculations.
Think of mixing ingredients in a recipe. As you stir, different particles align and combine over a certain distance (mixing length) to achieve a uniform mix. In turbulent flow, similar mixing happens as fluid layers interact over distances, influencing overall flow dynamics.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Prandtl assumed that the mixing length lm is a linear function of distance y from the wall, related through the von Karman constant (κ).
By assuming that the mixing length changes in a predictable way as distance from the wall increases, Prandtl's theory allows for easier calculations in turbulent flow. The constant κ, known as von Karman’s constant, introduces a standard factor into these calculations, simplifying the estimation of shear stresses substantially. This approach also bridges the gap between complex turbulence and measurable quantities.
Picture a playground slide, where the distance from the ground (wall) affects how fast kids slide down. The further you are from the ground, the more fun (and momentum) you experience, much like how mixing length increases with distance from a boundary in fluid mechanics.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In turbulent flow, the viscous shear stresses exist only near the boundary, with most of the region dominated by turbulence.
This highlights that in turbulent flows, the impact of viscosity diminishes away from boundaries, meaning that turbulent shear stress plays a more significant role in determining flow characteristics. The total shear stress can therefore be approximated primarily based on the turbulent components, leading to efficient flow design in hydraulic engineering.
Imagine a river with a smooth bank (boundary). The water right next to the bank is slower due to friction (viscous stress). However, a few feet away, the water churns with energy (turbulence), leading to faster movement downstream. This illustrates how turbulent flow governs most of the cross-section away from the boundary.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Laminar Flow: A type of flow where fluid moves in parallel layers with no disruption.
Turbulent Flow: A type of flow characterized by chaotic changes in pressure and velocity.
Eddy Viscosity: A measure of the turbulent diffusivity of momentum due to eddies in a fluid.
Mixing Length Theory: A model to estimate shear stress in turbulent flow using a characteristic mixing length.
Reynolds Number: A dimensionless quantity used to predict flow patterns in different fluid flow situations.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
An example of laminar flow is water flowing slowly through a narrow pipe, where fluid layers slide past one another smoothly.
Turbulent flow can be witnessed in swift river currents where eddies and irregular patterns dominate the flow.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In laminar flow, layers glide, viscosity is the only guide.
Imagine a group of children trying to mix colors in a jar—some are able to reach others, creating a beautiful swirl. This represents mixing length in ideal mixing.
Reynolds Shear Stress: Remember—R for Reynolds, S for Stress, T for Turbulence.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Shear Stress
Definition:
The stress component that acts parallel to the surface of a material.
Term: Eddy Viscosity (η)
Definition:
The additional viscosity in turbulent flow caused by turbulence.
Term: Reynolds Shear Stress
Definition:
Turbulent shear stress quantified as τ = -ρ u'v', considering fluctuating velocity components.
Term: Mixing Length (lm)
Definition:
The distance between two fluid layers permitting mixing and momentum transfer.
Term: Von Karman constant
Definition:
A dimensionless constant in fluid dynamics used in mixing length theory, usually taken as approximately 0.4.