Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we will discuss displacement thickness and momentum thickness, which are fundamental concepts in boundary layer theory. Displacement thickness refers to how much the outer streamline is pushed away from the wall due to viscous effects. Can anyone tell me how this might affect the design of hydraulic structures?
It could help in determining how much space we need for the flow to remain effective.
And it might influence the drag on the structure.
Exactly! Now, momentum thickness indicates the loss in momentum flux, which is crucial for understanding energy losses in flow. Remember, when we say loss of momentum, think about how viscosity impacts flow. How could we remember these two terms?
We could use 'Dim-thick' for displacement thickness and 'Mighty-momentum' for momentum thickness!
Great mnemonic! Let's summarize: displacement thickness pushes flow outward, while momentum thickness shows the reduction in flow efficiency.
Moving on, let's calculate mass flux through our elemental strip near the plate. The mass flux in a boundary layer can be represented as ρu * dA. Who remembers how we define dA here?
dA would be the width of the strip multiplied by its thickness, right?
Exactly! So, if we denote the width as b and thickness as dy, dA becomes b * dy. This leads us to calculate the reduction in mass flux due to the velocity difference. Can someone assist me in detailing this process?
We take the integral! The reduction can be shown as ρU - u times bdy, and we can integrate this from 0 to the boundary layer thickness delta.
Yes! The total reduction is significant for practical applications. Remember this integration approach as it’s key for many problems we’ll tackle.
Let's apply these principles! If we define a velocity distribution, how would we find the displacement thickness?
By using the integral 0 to delta of (1 - u/U) dy!
Correct! Once we compute this integral based on a given profile, we can systematically find the displacement thickness, right?
And this helps us understand how much the flow is affected in practical scenarios.
Exactly! And through understanding momentum and energy thickness, we quantify efficiency and energy losses in fluid systems. Can someone summarize what we learned?
We assessed how internal flow properties influence external pressure and structural design in hydraulic engineering!
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section elaborates on the effects of boundary layer flow on mass flux, introducing key concepts like displacement thickness and momentum thickness. It explains how these parameters arise from the velocity defects near a plate and their significance in analyzing fluid flow over surfaces.
This section provides a thorough introduction to the concept of mass flux reduction in hydraulic engineering, particularly during boundary layer flow near a flat plate. The essential ideas addressed include:
) as the distance by which a streamline just outside the boundary layer is moved due to viscous effects near the wall. Simultaneously, the momentum thickness () reflects the loss of momentum flux due to this flow disruption.
Understanding total reduction in mass flux is crucial for analyzing fluid behavior in practical applications such as drag reduction, turbulence management, and efficient design in hydraulic engineering.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, the mass flux through the elemental strip is given by, ρ u into dA. Ρ u is the sort of a momentum, ρ into u, mass into velocity. Of course, we have not considered the volume, right now, but we multiply it with dA, to have the mass flux. So, dA if you put dy, this becomes ρ U b into dy. Whereas, for the uniform velocity profile, so, the uniform velocity profile that exists in a region below this, the mass flux is given by, ρ into U, because this is the full velocity U. Here, it is u as a function of distance y, this one, so, here is ρ U b into dy, if there was the flow was uniform, and there was no plate, for example, and if you would have considered the same elemental area of thickness dy.
In this chunk, we discuss how mass flux is calculated in a fluid flow scenario over a flat plate. The mass flux (which is the mass flow per unit area) through an elemental strip is represented as ρu into dA. Here, ρ is the density of fluid, and u is the velocity at that point. When we take a small area differential (dA) equal to b multiplied by dy (where b is the width of the plate and dy is the thickness of the elemental strip), the mass flux becomes ρU b dy for the overall flow with a uniform velocity profile. This comparison helps establish a base for understanding how this changes in the presence of boundary layers.
Think of a garden hose. When you turn the water on, the flow of water comes out uniformly. This uniform flow can be imagined as a mass flux where water is flowing at a certain density and speed through a consistent area. However, if you were to place a fence within the stream of water (representing the flat plate), the water would start to flow differently around the fence, altering how much water (or mass flux) reaches certain areas downstream, just like the velocity profile changes near the boundary layer.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Therefore, the reduction in the mass flux through the elemental strip, compared to the uniform velocity profile will be the difference of the mass fluxes. This is due to uniform, that is, in the boundary layer, or if we take ρ outside, b and dy outside, it becomes ρ into U minus u into bdy.
In this chunk, we calculate the reduction in the mass flux caused by the presence of the boundary layer. The mass flux in a uniform flow can be expressed as ρU b dy, while in a non-uniform flow (within the boundary layer), it is expressed as ρu b dy. The difference between these two mass fluxes shows us how much mass flux has been reduced due to the boundary layer effects. This reduction can be summarized simply as: the change in mass flux due to flow separation caused by viscosity, resulting in differing velocities across the boundary layer.
Imagine a large crowd of people walking on a smooth surface. If everyone is walking at the same speed, it's like the uniform flow with the maximum mass flux. Now, if there's a narrow passage ahead that a few people have to squeeze through slowly, the overall flow is interrupted. The number of people that can pass through that area is reduced, similar to how the mass flux is reduced when a boundary layer forms in a fluid flow around an object.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, the total reduction in mass flux through BC, will be, we have considered and its thickness of dy. So, what we are going to do? We are going to simply integrate over this length. And let us say, this is so, let me, so, this distance is delta. So, the integration goes from 0 to delta and ρ U - u b dy, that is, the total reduction in mass flux through BC. I hope, this is clear, this is equation number 1.
To find the total reduction in mass flux over an area influenced by the boundary layer, we integrate the expression we derived for the reduction in mass flux (ρ(U - u)b dy) from the bottom of the boundary layer (y=0) to its upper limit (y=delta). This gives us a complete picture of how much total mass flux is affected over this height, leading to what we define in terms of equation number 1. This approach illustrates how differential elements contribute to the overall system dynamics in engineering fluid mechanics.
Think of an hourglass: as the sand (representing mass flux) flows from the upper bulb to the lower bulb through the narrow passage (akin to the boundary layer), the total amount of sand that passes through is a cumulative effect of how much sand is passing at each moment. If there were more grains stuck near the sides (like the viscous effects in our case), less sand would reach the bottom bulb compared to if it were flowing freely.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, when the plate is displaced by delta dash, such that, the velocity at delta dash is equal to U, then the reduction in mass flux through the distance delta dash is going to be, very simple. It is going to be ρ U because the velocity there is, U delta dash into b. So, we have assumed, that the place, I mean, the plate is displaced by delta dash, such that, the velocity at delta dash is equal to the uniform velocity U, that was, outside the boundary layer, then the reduction in the mass flux through that distance is going to be ρ U delta dash b, because at the plate it was 0.
In this section, we consider the situation where the plate is displaced by a certain amount delta dash. When this happens, we assume the velocity at this new hypothetical layer is equal to U — the velocity of the uniform flow outside the boundary layer. The mass flux over this section can now be simply calculated as ρU delta dash b (where b is the width) because it accounts for the entirely uniform state. This illustrates how boundary interactions change our understanding of mass flux within a fluid flow system.
Picture a river in which a boat moves downstream (the plate). If the boat suddenly accelerates and matches the speed of the water around it, the amount of water it displaces as it moves becomes much more predictable — you could say it’s now flowing uniformly with the water. This mirrors the idea that displacing the plate leads to a uniform effect on mass flux, akin to how the water interacts with the boat moving through.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Displacement Thickness: A distance by which the outer streamline moves away from the wall due to viscous effects.
Momentum Thickness: Represents the loss in momentum flux in the boundary layer compared to potential flow.
Mass Flux: The flow rate of mass through a unit area in the direction of flow.
Energy Thickness: The reduction in kinetic energy of the fluid due to velocity defects near the wall.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Example 1: If a fluid flows over a flat plate, the velocity at the wall is zero, while it increases linearly to U. This creates a boundary layer with an identifiable displacement and momentum thickness.
Example 2: For a boundary layer profile defined by u/U = y/delta, where delta is the boundary layer thickness, one can calculate both displacement and momentum thickness by applying respective integrals.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In the flux of flow, the boundary does show, how thickness can grow, and energy's low.
Imagine a river flowing smoothly over a flat surface. As it encounters a rough patch, the speeds at the surface slow down, creating a 'boundary layer' that alters the flow structure.
D for Displacement and M for Momentum: Remember DM thickness as an important pair in boundary layer flow.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Displacement Thickness
Definition:
The distance by which the outer streamline is pushed away from the wall due to viscous effects.
Term: Momentum Thickness
Definition:
A measure of loss in momentum flux compared to potential flow due to viscosity effects in the boundary layer.
Term: Mass Flux
Definition:
The amount of mass passing through a unit area per unit time, often represented by ρu.
Term: Boundary Layer
Definition:
The thin region of fluid flow near a surface where viscous effects are significant.
Term: Velocity Profile
Definition:
The distribution of fluid velocity across a cross-section of the flow.
Term: Energy Thickness
Definition:
A measure of the reduction in kinetic energy in the boundary layer compared to potential flow.