2.2 - Power Savings Calculation
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Introduction to Friction Factor
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Today, we're diving into the friction factor, or 'f'. It's critical in determining head loss in pipe flow. Can anyone tell me how we calculate it?
I think it's a function of the Reynolds number and relative roughness, right?
Exactly, well done! The friction factor can be calculated using the Moody chart or a couple of equations like the Colebrook or Haaland formulas. Remember the importance of epsilon over D, which is the relative roughness!
What does that mean for head loss?
Great question! Head loss is indeed a function of the friction factor. The more friction, the more energy you lose as head loss. Hence, we seek to minimize these losses!
So if we decrease roughness, we save power?
Exactly! And we'll calculate that power savings shortly.
In summary, friction factors directly impact head loss and consequently power savings. Understanding their relationship is key.
Calculating Head Loss
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Now, let's calculate the head loss. Who can remember the formula for head loss?
It's hf equals fLV² over 2gD!
Correct! Now let’s plug in the values for head loss before lining.
We're using a friction factor of 0.0379, right?
Yes! And what’s the discharge rate and length you have?
It's given as 4 cubic meters per second and the length is 1000 meters.
Excellent. Now calculate using the equation. Head loss before lining, go!
It comes out as 6.6 meters!
Exactly! Now let’s add the lining and see the power savings from reduced head loss.
Power Savings Calculation
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
So, we have the head loss before and after lining. Do you remember how to find power savings?
It's gamma times Q times hs!
Right! And what is the gamma value in kilowatts?
It's 9.79.
Good! Now let's compute the power savings of 4 cubic meters and the head saving of 4.15 meters.
That gives us around 162.5 kilowatts!
Well done! That’s how reducing head loss directly correlates with power savings.
As a recap, we calculated the head loss before and after lining, and finally computed the saved power based on this reduction.
Introduction & Overview
Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.
Quick Overview
Standard
In this section, we explore the relationship between friction factors, head loss, and power savings in hydraulic systems. By examining an example of reducing friction in a pipe due to lining, we can quantify the potential power savings resulting from decreased head loss.
Detailed
In hydraulic engineering, the calculation of power savings during pipe flow involves understanding the relationship between the friction factor, head loss, and power utilized. The Darcy-Weisbach equation helps us to derive these relationships. In the worked example, we analyze a corroded concrete pipe with an initial roughness that is reduced by adding a lining to calculate the resulting head loss before and after intervention and how this change translates into power savings per kilometer of the pipe. We also introduce important formulas such as the Haaland equation to derive the friction factor and subsequently calculate major head loss.
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Problem Statement
Chapter 1 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
A badly corroded concrete pipe of diameter 1.5 m has an equivalent sand roughness of epsilon S = 15 mm. A thick lining of 10 mm is proposed to reduce the roughness to epsilon S = 0.2 mm. The question is to calculate the power saved per kilometer of the pipe for a discharge of 4 m³/s.
Detailed Explanation
This problem involves understanding how the roughness of a pipe affects fluid flow. When a pipe is corroded, it has a greater roughness, which increases the resistance to flow and, therefore, leads to higher energy losses and reduced efficiency. Adding a lining smooths the internal surface of the pipe, thus reducing its effective roughness. The goal is to calculate how much power (energy per unit time) is saved due to this reduction in roughness as we expect lower energy losses in the form of heat.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine trying to slide down a slide covered in sandpaper compared to one that is smooth. The roughness of the sandpaper makes it harder and slower to slide down, just like a rough pipe makes it harder for water to flow through, leading to higher energy costs for pumping.
Calculating Initial Flow Conditions
Chapter 2 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Before lining: Velocity V1 = Q/A = 4 m³/s / (π/4)(1.5 m)² = 2.264 m/s. Reynolds number Re1 = V1 * D1 / ν. Re1 = 2.264 * 1.5 / (1 x 10^(-6)) = 3.395 x 10^6. Epsilon S1/D1 = 15 mm / 1.5 m = 0.10.
Detailed Explanation
To find the initial conditions before any modifications are made, we calculated the velocity of flow through the pipe using the formula for velocity (Velocity = Flow Rate / Cross-Sectional Area). Once we have the velocity, we can calculate the Reynolds number which helps us understand the flow regime (laminar or turbulent). The friction factor and head loss are dependent on Reynolds number as well as relative roughness (epsilon/D).
Examples & Analogies
Think of this like figuring out how quickly water flows through a hose. We first need to know how much water is flowing and the size of the hose (diameter) to understand how fast it's coming out. The Reynolds number tells us whether the flow is smooth or turbulent, similar to how the rush of water can either be consistent or create splashes depending on how fast it's flowing.
Calculating Friction Factors
Chapter 3 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Using the Haaland equation or Moody chart, we calculate the friction factor before lining: f1 = 0.0379 (using Haaland equation).
Detailed Explanation
The friction factor is crucial for determining head loss in the pipe. We can find the friction factor using either the Haaland equation or a Moody chart, both of which relate flow characteristics to friction loss in the pipe. The Haaland equation is particularly useful because it directly gives a formula based on the Reynolds number and relative roughness.
Examples & Analogies
If we compare it to driving a car, the friction factor is like the road surface condition. A smooth road (lower friction) lets your car glide effortlessly, while a rough road (higher friction) makes the ride bumpy and slow. Understanding these factors helps engineers design better, more efficient systems.
Post-Lining Calculations
Chapter 4 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
After lining, the new diameter D2 = 1.48 m. New velocity V2 = Q/A = 4 m³/s / (π/4)(1.48 m)² = 2.325 m/s. New Reynolds number Re2 = 2.325 * 1.48 / (1 x 10^(-6)) = 3.44 x 10^6. Epsilon S2/D2 = 0.2 mm / 1.48 m = 1.35 x 10^(-4). Calculate friction factor f2 = 0.0132.
Detailed Explanation
After applying the lining, we recalculate the diameter of the pipe, which slightly changes the flow characteristics. The fluid velocity is recalculated with the new area. This change also affects the Reynolds number and relative roughness again, allowing us to calculate the new friction factor using the same methods as before.
Examples & Analogies
Adding a lining to the pipe can be compared to changing the width of a river. A slightly wider river allows more water to flow through without as much resistance, similar to how the lining reduces friction and allows for more efficient fluid flow.
Head Loss Calculations
Chapter 5 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Head loss before lining: hf1 = f1 * L * V1² / (2g * D1) = 6.6 m. Head loss after lining: hf2 = f2 * L * V2² / (2g * D2) = 2.450 m. Savings in head: hs = hf1 - hf2 = 6.6 m - 2.450 m = 4.150 m.
Detailed Explanation
We calculate the head loss before and after the application of lining using the Darcy-Weisbach equation to see how much head loss has been reduced. The difference in head loss directly translates to how much energy is saved in pumping the fluid through the pipe.
Examples & Analogies
Consider head loss like trying to push a cart up a slope. A steep incline (higher head loss) requires more effort than a gentle slope (lower head loss). Reducing the slope (head loss) makes it easier to push the cart (more efficient fluid flow).
Power Savings Calculation
Chapter 6 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Savings in power = γ * Q * hs = 9.79 kN/m³ * 4 m³/s * 4.150 m = 162.5 kW.
Detailed Explanation
Finally, we calculate the power savings which is the energy saved per unit time due to the reduction in head loss. This is computed by multiplying the weight of the fluid (density times gravity) by flow rate and the head saved. The result shows how much less energy is required to pump the water after the lining is applied.
Examples & Analogies
If we think of power savings as the effort saved when pushing a cart, reducing the resistance (head loss) means you expend less energy to get the same amount of work done (moving the fluid). In practical terms, this translates to cost savings on energy bills.
Key Concepts
-
Friction Factor: A crucial value used to determine the head loss in pipe flow.
-
Head Loss: Energy loss due to pipe friction, which impacts overall efficiency.
-
Power Savings: The decrease in energy consumption that results from reduced head loss.
-
Reynolds Number: A dimensionless number that characterizes flow conditions in the pipe.
-
Moody Chart: A graphical tool for determining friction factors based on Reynolds number and relative roughness.
Examples & Applications
Example of calculating power savings by reducing roughness in a concrete pipe using the Friction Factor.
Scenario where air flows through small diameter tubing, calculating pressure drops in laminar and turbulent conditions.
Memory Aids
Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts
Rhymes
Friction matters in the flow, less is more, save the pro!
Stories
Imagine a water park with a smooth slide (less friction) versus a rough slide (more friction) — where do you think kids have more fun and make fewer splashes? The smoother the slide, the better the ride!
Memory Tools
Friction Forces Lead Power Savings: FFLPS to remember friction, flow, loss, power, and savings.
Acronyms
H.E.A.D = Head Energy And Diminution represents how changes in head affect energy savings.
Flash Cards
Glossary
- Friction Factor (f)
A dimensionless number used to describe the friction losses in a fluid flow due to the relative roughness and Reynolds number.
- Head Loss (hf)
The energy loss due to friction in a length of pipe, typically measured in meters.
- Power Savings (Ps)
The reduction of power consumption in pumping systems, quantified as the product of the weight density, flow rate, and head loss savings.
- Reynolds Number (Re)
A dimensionless quantity that helps predict flow patterns in different fluid flow situations.
- Moody Chart
A graphical representation of the relationship between the Darcy-Weisbach friction factor, Reynolds number, and relative roughness.
Reference links
Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.