Formulating Evidence-based Recommendations (7) - Unit 4: Evaluating (Criterion D)
Students

Academic Programs

AI-powered learning for grades 8-12, aligned with major curricula

Professional

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design

Games

Interactive Games

Fun games to boost memory, math, typing, and English skills

Formulating Evidence-Based Recommendations

Formulating Evidence-Based Recommendations

Practice

Interactive Audio Lesson

Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.

Introduction to Recommendations

πŸ”’ Unlock Audio Lesson

Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson

0:00
--:--
Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Today, we're diving into how to create meaningful recommendations from user testing insights. Can anyone explain why recommendations are essential?

Student 1
Student 1

I think recommendations help improve the design based on user needs.

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Exactly! Recommendations bridge the gap between what users experience and how we can enhance their experience. What's a key component of a sound recommendation?

Student 2
Student 2

A problem statement that clearly defines the issue.

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Right on! A problem statement sets the foundation for understanding the challenges users face.

Gathering Supporting Evidence

πŸ”’ Unlock Audio Lesson

Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson

0:00
--:--
Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Let's talk about supporting evidenceβ€”how do we gather data to support our recommendations?

Student 3
Student 3

We can use metrics collected from usability tests.

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

That's correct! By analyzing metrics like average completion time or error rates, we provide a factual basis for our recommendations.

Student 4
Student 4

Can this evidence also include qualitative feedback?

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Absolutely! Combining quantitative and qualitative data gives a fuller picture of user experiences.

Proposing Changes

πŸ”’ Unlock Audio Lesson

Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson

0:00
--:--
Teacher
Teacher Instructor

What do we do after we gather our supporting evidence?

Student 1
Student 1

We suggest changes based on the evidence.

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Yes! It's vital to propose realistic and specific changes that can be tested. What's a good example of this?

Student 2
Student 2

If users hesitate with an icon, we might suggest replacing it with a clearly labeled button.

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Great example! It shows we are directly addressing user issues.

Expected Outcomes

πŸ”’ Unlock Audio Lesson

Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson

0:00
--:--
Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Now, let's discuss the expected outcomes of our recommendations. Why is this an important step?

Student 3
Student 3

It helps gauge how effective the changes will be.

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Exactly! By anticipating outcomes, we can prioritize which changes to implement based on expected benefits. Can anyone suggest an expected outcome for our earlier button example?

Student 4
Student 4

Maybe reducing the decision time by 20%?

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Right! Estimating improvements like that helps us make informed design decisions.

Introduction & Overview

Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.

Quick Overview

This section emphasizes transforming user testing insights into actionable recommendations that improve product usability and overall user experience.

Standard

In this section, the focus is on formulating evidence-based recommendations from usability testing data. Key steps include defining problem statements, supporting evidence, proposed changes, and expected outcomes, all aimed at improving design effectiveness and user satisfaction.

Detailed

Formulating Evidence-Based Recommendations

This section is pivotal in converting insights from usability tests into structured, actionable recommendations that enhance user experience with the design. It outlines a systematic approach for identifying issues, framing supporting evidence, proposing actionable changes, and predicting their impact.

Key Components:

  1. Problem Statement: Clearly articulate the recurring issues identified during usability testing. For instance, stating that users misinterpret a certain icon can clarify the root of user confusion.
  2. Supporting Evidence: Base your recommendations on solid data sourced from user interactions, such as average decision times or error rates encountered when using features. This lends credibility to your proposals.
  3. Proposed Changes: Suggest implementable revisions, such as redesigning an icon for clarity, while also considering testing alternatives for placement and design, which ensures flexibility in resolving usability challenges.
  4. Expected Outcome: Facilitate a predictive understanding of the effects of proposed changes. Estimating potential improvements in efficiency or user satisfaction can help prioritize changes based on impact.

This systematic approach ensures that feedback from real users is directly translated into design enhancements, solidifying the efficacy of each iterative leap in the design cycle.

Audio Book

Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.

Creating Problem Statements

Chapter 1 of 5

πŸ”’ Unlock Audio Chapter

Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience

0:00
--:--

Chapter Content

  1. Problem Statement: β€œUsers consistently misinterpret the β€˜hamburger’ icon as menu access, leading to task delays.”

Detailed Explanation

A problem statement succinctly identifies an issue encountered by users, providing a clear focus for enhancements. In this example, the problem is that users are confused by the icon representing the menu. Highlighting the specific issue helps teams understand what needs fixing to improve user performance.

Examples & Analogies

Think of it as explaining a traffic jam on a highway. If the road signs are confusing, drivers might take the wrong exit, leading to delays. Identifying that confusing signage is the problem helps engineers focus on ways to improve that signage and streamline traffic flow.

Supporting Evidence

Chapter 2 of 5

πŸ”’ Unlock Audio Chapter

Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience

0:00
--:--

Chapter Content

  1. Supporting Evidence: β€œSeven out of ten participants paused for an average of 8 seconds before clicking the icon.”

Detailed Explanation

Supporting evidence provides quantifiable data to back up the problem statement. By collecting data from usability testing, you can illustrate the extent of the issue, making it more persuasive. Here, the metrics reveal that a significant number of users faced delays, reinforcing the need for change.

Examples & Analogies

Imagine a teacher grading a student's essay. If many students frequently pause to think about the meaning of a term used in the essay, the teacher knows to explain that term more clearly in future lessons. This evidence shows the problem isn't just isolated but is experienced by many.

Proposed Changes

Chapter 3 of 5

πŸ”’ Unlock Audio Chapter

Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience

0:00
--:--

Chapter Content

  1. Proposed Change: β€œReplace the icon with a labeled β€˜Menu’ button and test alternative placements.”

Detailed Explanation

This chunk outlines a specific actionable resolution to the identified problem. It suggests changing the confusing icon to a more intuitive label, which users can quickly recognize and understand. Testing alternative placements ensures that the solution is effective in various contexts.

Examples & Analogies

Consider how a coach might adjust a team's play strategy after observing confusing performance. If players frequently misinterpret signals, the coach might decide to use clear signals insteadβ€”this change provides clarity, just like labeling the icon improves user experience.

Expected Outcomes

Chapter 4 of 5

πŸ”’ Unlock Audio Chapter

Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience

0:00
--:--

Chapter Content

  1. Expected Outcome: β€œAnticipate a reduction in decision time by at least 20%, improving overall task efficiency.”

Detailed Explanation

Expected outcomes project the potential impact of implementing the proposed changes. By estimating measurable improvements (such as a 20% reduction in decision time), the recommendation becomes more actionable and motivates stakeholders to support the change because they can see potential benefits.

Examples & Analogies

Think about switching from a slow internet service provider to a faster one. If the new provider guarantees improved speeds, you can expect to complete online tasks much quicker. Similarly, estimating outcomes helps stakeholders visualize the benefits of a change in design.

Impact-Effort Matrix

Chapter 5 of 5

πŸ”’ Unlock Audio Chapter

Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience

0:00
--:--

Chapter Content

Employ an impact-effort matrix to rate each recommendation: plot high-impact, low-effort items as top priority.

Detailed Explanation

An impact-effort matrix helps prioritize recommendations based on their potential benefits versus the amount of work needed to implement them. By identifying high-impact, low-effort changes, teams can make effective improvements quickly, maximizing resource use and increasing project efficiency.

Examples & Analogies

It’s like organizing a chore list. If you can clean your small bathroom in 15 minutes, but vacuuming the big living room takes an hour, cleaning the bathroom may be a higher priority due to the low effort and significant impact on tidiness.

Key Concepts

  • Evidence-Based Recommendations: Proposals derived from user testing data.

  • Problem Statement: A clear definition of the user issues encountered.

  • Supporting Evidence: Data that supports the rationale for design changes.

  • Expected Outcome: Predicted effects of the proposed modifications.

Examples & Applications

A common problem statement might be 'Users take too long to find the payment options,' leading to a recommendation to simplify navigation.

Supporting evidence could show '80% of users reported confusion with the current design,' backing the recommendation to redesign specific elements.

Memory Aids

Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts

🎡

Rhymes

To aid the design, listen to what users say; recommend the change to improve their day!

πŸ“–

Stories

Imagine a bakery where customers often complain about the long wait. By gathering feedback, the baker discovers that simplifying the order process speeds things up, drastically improving customer satisfaction.

🧠

Memory Tools

Remember R-E-P: Recommendations, Evidence, Proposals (for suggested changes), Outcomes (predicted results).

🎯

Acronyms

PERSO

Problem

Evidence

Recommendation

Solution

Outcome.

Flash Cards

Glossary

EvidenceBased Recommendation

A proposal for design improvement grounded in data collected from user testing.

Problem Statement

A clear articulation of the issues users encounter while using a design.

Supporting Evidence

Data that substantiates the need for proposed changes, drawn from user interactions and feedback.

Expected Outcome

The predicted result or impact of implementing the proposed changes.

Reference links

Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.