Practice Paper 2: Essay Paper - 15.2.2 | Unit 15: Exam Preparation and Assessment Criteria | IB Board Grade 12 – Individuals and Societies
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Academics
Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Professional Courses
Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

games

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What are the four Assessment Objectives that Paper 2 evaluates?

💡 Hint: Remember the acronym KASE.

Question 2

Easy

Define 'Command Terms' in the context of exams.

💡 Hint: Think about action verbs.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the duration of the Paper 2 essay?

  • 1 hour
  • 1 hour 45 minutes
  • 2 hours

💡 Hint: Consider how long you have when answering the essay question.

Question 2

True or False: Planning your essay is not necessary.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Think about why students might get less done without planning.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Draft an outline for an essay responding to the question: 'To what extent has social media influenced public opinion on climate change?'

💡 Hint: Structure your outline in line with the essay format discussed.

Question 2

Critically analyze the following statement: 'Case studies are less effective than theoretical frameworks in IB essays.' What arguments could you present to support or refute this claim?

💡 Hint: Consider supporting your analysis with examples from both sides.

Challenge and get performance evaluation